Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 20;6(1):e2251745. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51745

Table 2. Association Between NDI and Serum Proteome Signatures Defining 6 Biological Processes Among 786 African and European American Population Controlsa.

Characteristic Model statistics R2, % F 1,2 RMSE F statistic P value ANOVA β 95% CI)b P value
Model 1 (multivariate ANOVA)
Wilk λ 0.441 NA 66.0, 4120.3 NA 10.33 <.001 NA NA
Pillai trace 0.705 NA 66.0, 4.644.0 NA 9.37 <.001 NA NA
Lawley-Hotelling trace 0.967 NA 66.0, 4604.0 NA 11.24 <.001 NA NA
Roy largest root 0.556 NA 11.0, 774.0 NA 39.09 <.001 NA NA
Pathways
Autophagy NA 3.28 NA 0.496 2.388 .007 0.032 (−0.015 to 0.080) .176
Chemotaxis NA 11.96 NA 0.351 9.555 <.001 0.048 (0.015 0.081) .005
Inflammation NA 5.86 NA 0.353 4.378 <.001 0.037 (0.003 to 0.070) .031
Promotion NA 9.90 NA 0.415 7.731 <.001 0.03 (−0.008 to 0.071) .118
Suppression NA 11.12 NA 0.333 8.803 <.001 0.038 (0.007 to 0.069) .018
Vasculature NA 11.86 NA 0.335 9.465 <.001 0.026 (−0.005 to 0.058) .104
Model 2 (multivariate ANOVA)
Wilk λ 0.395 NA 114.0, 4388.4 NA 6.74 <.001 NA NA
Pillai trace 0.805 NA 114.0, 4596.0 NA 6.24 <.001 NA NA
Lawley-Hotelling trace 1.090 NA 114.0, 4556.0 NA 7.26 <.001 NA NA
Roy largest root 0.571 NA 766.00 NA 23.01 <.001 NA NA
Pathways
Autophagy NA 4.50 NA 0.496 1.890 .012 0.027 (−0.025 to 0.079) .306
Chemotaxis NA 13.9 NA 0.349 6.501 <.001 0.050 (0.013 to 0.086) .008
Inflammation NA 7.3 NA 0.352 3.189 <.001 0.031 (−0.006 to 0.067) .104
Promotion NA 11.2 NA 0.415 5.067 <.001 0.007 (−0.036 to 0.051) .737
Suppression NA 12.4 NA 0.332 5.726 <.001 0.021 (−0.013 to 0.056) .228
Vasculature NA 13.0 NA 0.335 6.015 <.001 0.024 (−0.012 to 0.059) .189

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; NA, not applicable; NDI, national deprivation index; RMSE, root mean square error.

a

NDI was derived from principal components analysis using 2000 census tract for 4 dimensions of socioeconomic status: educational level, employment, occupation, and poverty, standardized to mean (SD) 0 (1). The index was operationalized as continuous (where higher scores indicate greater deprivation). Model 1 multiple ANOVA adjusted for age at study entry (continuous), aspirin use (yes/no), family history of prostate cancer (first-degree relatives, yes/no), diabetes (yes/no), body mass index at study entry (continuous), self-reported race (not included in stratified analyses, African American, European American), smoking status (current, former, never), and West African ancestry (continuous). Model 2 additionally adjusted for educational level (high school or less, some college, college, professional school, missing), individual income (<$10 000, $10 000-$29 999, $30 000-$59 999, $60 000-$90 000, >$90 000).

b

Represent estimates of each pathway modeled independently.