Table 4.

Performance comparison of this work with those of recently published.

Factor	[11]	[15]	[16]	[18]	Proposed
Number of active devices	3 DDCC	5-DDTA	3 DDTA	2 DDTA	3 DDTA
Realization	130 nm	180 nm	130 nm	130 nm	180 nm
Number of passive devices	2 R, 2 C	2 C	2 C	2 C	2 C
Type of filter	MISO	MIMO	MIMO	MIMO	MIMO
Operation mode	VM	VM/CM/TAM/TIM	VM	VM	VM/TIM
Number of offered responses	5 (VM)	36 (VM/CM/TAM/TIM)	23 (VM)	22 (VM)	34 (VM) 11 (TIM)
Active device offers electronic control	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
High-input and low-output impedance of VM	Yes	No	No	No	Yes
High-input and high-output impedance of TM	-	Yes	-	-	Yes
Orthogonal control of ${\omega }_o$ and $Q$	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Electronic control of ${\omega }_o$	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Offer modified into oscillator	No	No	No	Yes	Yes
Orthogonal control of CO and FO	-	-	-	Yes	Yes
Natural frequency (kHz)	6370	1.04	0.254	0.08147	0.323
Simulated power supply (V)	$\pm$0.75	1.2	0.5	0.3	0.5
Power dissipation ($\mu W$)	3650	330	0.616	0.715	0.646
THD (%)	3 @120 m Vpp	1.09@650 mVpp	0.62 @100 m Vpp	0.5 @100 m Vpp	0.8@100 mVpp
Dynamic range (dB)	-	-	49.7	-	53.2
Verification of result	Sim/Exp	Sim/Exp	Sim	Sim	Sim