Table 3.
Evaluation of empirical curves for the goodness-of-fit of the theoretical curves to exponential decay (see also Figure S1XIX).
| Cargo Protein | Protocol | Significance of Statistic | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEL | CST | CSGF | CST (Chi2) |
SKT | R2 | |||
| ED | PED | |||||||
| VFP | 1A. E-40-15-40-small | * | * | * | * | * | 0.851 | 0.932 |
| 1B. F-40-15-40-small | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.943 | 0.941 | |
| 2A. E-40-15-40-large | * | * | * | * | * | 0.812 | 0.950 | |
| 2B. F-40-15-40-large | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.934 | 0.923 | |
| 3A. E-40-32-40-small | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.879 | 0.935 | |
| 3B. F-40-32-40-small | * | * | * | * | * | 0.937 | 0.961 | |
| 5A. E-40-32 (iFRAP) | ND | * | * | * | * | 0.836 | 0.949 | |
| 5B. E-40-32 (piFRAP) | ND | * | * | * | * | 0.853 | 0.954 | |
| 5C. F-40-32 (iFRAP) | ND | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.945 | 0.929 | |
| 5D. F-40-32 (piFRAP) | ND | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.928 | 0.927 | |
| 6A. StSt-iFRAP | ND | ns | ns | * | * | 0.921 | 0.911 | |
| 7A. F-32-40 outgoing | ND | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.931 | 0.933 | |
| AFP | 4A. E-CHM-15-CHM | * | * | * | * | * | 0.817 | 0.947 |
| 4B. F-CHM-15-CHM | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.925 | 0.954 | |
| 6A. StSt-iFRAP | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.941 | 0.939 | |
| 6B. StSt-piFRAP | * | * | * | * | * | 0.811 | 0.933 | |
| SFP | 4A. E-CHM-15-CHM | * | * | * | * | * | 0.818 | 0.951 |
| 4B. F-CHM-15-CHM | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.928 | 0.921 | |
| PFP | 1A. E-40-15-40-small | * | * | * | * | * | 0.826 | 0.947 |
| 1B. F-40-15-40-small | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.939 | 0.931 | |
| 2A. E-40-15-40-large | * | * | * | * | * | 0.841 | 0.943 | |
| 2B. F-40-15-40-large | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.942 | 0.939 | |
| 6A. StSt-iFRAP | ND | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.933 | 0.929 | |
The H0 hypothesis assumed that the empirical distribution belongs to the theoretical one, which was rejected when the difference between the theoretical distribution and observed distribution was insignificant (Fd < Fst for p < 0.05); None of the empirical curves of regression fit the linear regression; All of the empirical curves obtained under the conditions when the Golgi complex was ribbon-like followed the regression curve with a plateau followed by exponential decay.; ns, not significant; p > 0.05; *, p < 0.05; ND, not determined; DEL, difference between two empirical regression curves; CSGF, Chi-squared goodness-of-fit; CST, Chi-squared test; SKT, the Smirnov–Kolmogorov test; R2, Coefficient of determination or R-squared test; ED, exponential decay: comparison between the observed distribution and exponential decay; PED, plateau followed by exponential decay: comparison between the observed distribution and the plateau followed by exponential decay.