Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 5;24(2):1002. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021002

Table 1.

Summary of data alignment statistics for control and drought samples from contrasting rice cultivars.

Sample Name Raw Reads Clean Reads Aligned Reads Mapping Efficiency (%)
IPC_1 48,966,509 48,836,418 46,192,763 94.59
IPC_2 53,966,608 53,824,700 50,887,777 94.54
IPC_3 58,966,608 58,712,210 53,254,093 94.47
IPT_1 51,707,279 49,000,200 41,855,876 85.42
IPT_2 52,207,282 49,475,010 42,261,648 85.42
IPT_3 52,207,282 49,475,010 42,261,648 85.42
NPC_1 54,547,228 53,298,510 49,754,853 93.35
NPC_2 45,738,722 42,088,332 39,179,553 93.08
NPC_3 45,312,718 44,272,050 41,333,550 93.36
NPT_1 55,322,536 55,124,818 51,637,008 93.67
NPT_2 65,243,028 64,132,208 59,876,829 93.36
NPT_3 60,373,548 60,267,168 56,349,061 93.50

(IPC = IR 64, panicle, control; IPT = IR 64, panicle, drought-treated; NPC = N 22, panicle, control; NPT = N 22, panicle, drought-treated).