Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 9;12(2):548. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020548

Table 3.

Risk-of-bias summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk-of-bias item for each included study.

Study Criteria
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Berin, E. et al., 2019 [7] Low Low High Low Low Low Low Low
Hakestad, K.A. et al., 2015 [15] Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Hartley, C. et al., 2020 [22] High Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Son, W.M. et al., 2020 [23] Low Low Low High Low Low Low Low
Bittar, S.T. et al., 2015 [24] Low High High High Low Low Low Unclear
Prado- Nunes, P.R. et al., 2016 [25] High High High High Low Low Low High
Martinho, N.M. et al., 2016 [26] Low Low Low High Low Low Low Low
Multanem, J. et al., 2017 [27] Low High Low High Low Low Low Low
Ganderton, C. et al., 2018 [28] Low High Low Low Low Low Low Low
Watson, S.L. et al., 2018 [29] Low Low High High Low Low Low Unclear
Nunes, R.P.P. et al., 2019 [30] High High High High Low Low Low High
Watson, S.L. et al., 2019 [31] Low Low High High High Low Low Unclear

Data extracted from the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Criteria: 1, Random sequence generation; 2, Allocation concealment; 3, Blinding of participants and personnel; 4, Blinding of outcome assessment; 5, Incomplete outcome data; 6, Selective reporting; 7, Other bias; 8, Risk of bias.