Table 1.
Comparison of proposed dual-band antenna with the previously presented antennas in the literature operating at same bands.
| Ref | Size (mm3) |
Operational Mode | Resonant Frequency (GHz) |
Operational Bandwidth (GHz) |
Gain (dBi) |
Radiation Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [5] | 60 × 80 × 3 | Single | 2.42 | 2.37–2.44 | 8.68 | - |
| [6] | 200 × 15 × 3 | Single | 2.3 | 2.2–2.57 | 8.5 | - |
| [7] | 45 × 42 × 1.27 | Single | 2.7 | 2.38–3.1 | 4.8 | - |
| [8] | 40 × 10 × 1.6 | Single | 2.4 | 2.38–2.43 | 1.34 | 79 |
| [9] | 38 × 33.2 × 1.5 | Single | 2.4 | 2.37–2.43 | 1 | - |
| [10] | 40 × 30 × 1.6 | Single | 2.4 | 2.2–2.73 | 3.28 | - |
| [11] | 76 × 57.2 × 1.6 | Single | 2.4 | 2.38–2.42 | 3.1 | - |
| [12] | 30 × 25 × 3.2 | Single | 5.2 | 5.1–5.32 | 6.3 | - |
| [13] | 142 × 60 × 0.5 | Single | 5.2 | 5.17–5.26 | 4.5 | - |
| [14] | 16 × 19 × 1.6 | Single | 5.38 | 5.35–5.4 | 5.83 | - |
| [15] | 55 × 52 × 1.57 | Single | 5.2 | 5.1–5.3 | 6.2 | - |
| [16] | 32 × 28 × 1.6 | Dual | 2.4/5.2 | 2.3–2.5/4.9–6 | - | - |
| [17] | 14.5 × 14 × 1.6 | Single | 5.2 | 5–5.3 | 3.3 | 41.7 |
| [18] | 42 × 36 × 2.4 | Dual | 2.4/3.3 | 2.2–2.45/3.3–3.45 | 4.6/4.2 | - |
| [19] | 18 × 17 × 4 | Dual | 2.4/5.2 | 2.4–2.48/5.15–5.35 | 4.1/1.4 | - |
| [20] | 44.5 × 44.5 ×1.6 | Dual | 2.4/5.8 | 2.2–2.4/5.7–5.9 | 4.8/4.7 | - |
| [21] | 100 × 100 × 0.8 | Dual | 2.3/5.2 | 2.4–2.6/4.9–5.3 | 4.8/5.7 | 70/70 |
| [22] | 74 × 27 × 17 | Dual | 2.4/5.4 | 2.34–2.5/5.06–5.9 | 3.8/6.8 | - |
| This Work | 30 × 18 × 0.79 | Dual | 2.4/5.4 | 2.25–2.8/5–5.65 | 3.9/4.8 | 92/94 |