Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 27;13(1):71. doi: 10.3390/life13010071

Table 1.

Speed comparison between COOBoostR and random-forest algorithm.

Cancer Type n Inspection Type Average Time (s) Min Time (s) Max Time (s)
Colorectal cancer 9 Random forest 1R 316,777 303,240 335,601
COOBoostR 1R * 8 6 11
COOBoostR 100R 761 577 1130
Esophageal adenocarcinoma
Ross-Innes. et al. [4]
23 Random forest 1R 447,082 409,602 475,357
COOBoostR 1R * 16 10 26
COOBoostR 100R 1588 1047 2615
Liver cancer 64 Random forest 1R 456,407 370,398 720,583
COOBoostR 1R * 7 4 15
COOBoostR 100R 707 383 1484

* COOBoostR 1R values were estimated from COOBoostR 100R investigation.