Table 6.
Comparison results of this work with previous related studies.
Proposed in | Ref. [22] | Ref. [23] | Ref. [24] | Ref. [25] | Ref. [26] | Ref. [27] | Ref. [28] | Ref. [29] | This Work |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC-type topology | SS | LC/CC | LCL/P | LCC/LCC | Four-coil | LC/CL | Three-coil | LC/S | CLC/N |
Number of Coils | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Max power | 15 W | 50 W | 100 W | 6.6 kW | 6.6 kW | 96.8 W | 225 W | 63.8 W | 192 W |
Peak efficiency | 92.6% | 92.4% | 92.8% | 96.1% | 96.3% | 90.3% | 92.5% | 91.9% | 93.3% |
Number of transmitter-side compensation components | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Number of receiver-side compensation components | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Output current unconstrained by LCT parameters | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Without filter inductor behind the rectifier | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Compact and low-cost receiver | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |