Table 1.

Methodological Quality Assessment: Coleman Methodological Score.

Authors, Years	Part A: Only One Score to Be Given for Each of the 7 Sections
	Study Size	Mean Follow-Up	Surgical Approach	Type of Study	Description of Diagnosis	Descriptions of Surgical Technique	Description of Postoperative Rehabilitation
Abubeih et al., 2018 [14]	4	4	10	10	5	10	5
Ahn et al., 2022 [15]	4	7	10	0	5	10	5
Alauddinet al., 2022 [16]	4	0	10	10	5	5	0
Alhaug et al., 2019 [17]	4	7	10	0	5	10	5
Elias et al., 2007 [18]	4	4	10	0	5	10	5
Khalid et al., 2019 [19]	0	4	10	0	5	10	5
Koh et al., 2019 [20]	4	4	0	0	5	10	5
Lever et al., 2018 [21]	4	10	10	0	5	10	5
Lui et al., 2012 [22]	0	7	10	10	5	10	0
Maffulli et al., 2010 [8]	4	7	10	10	5	10	5
Maffulli et al., 2012 [23]	4	10	10	10	5	10	5
Maffulli et al., 2015 [24]	4	7	10	0	5	10	5
Maffulli et al., 2018 [25]	4	4	7	10	5	10	5
Mahajan et al., 2009 [26]	4	4	10	0	5	10	5
Miao et al., 2016 [27]	4	4	10	0	5	10	5
Oksanen et al., 2014 [28]	0	4	10	0	5	10	5
Ozer et al., 2018 [29]	4	10	10	10	5	10	5
Pintore et al., 2001 [30]	7	7	7	10	5	10	5
Singh et al., 2014 [31]	4	4	10	0	5	10	5
Tay et al., 2010 [32]	0	4	10	10	5	10	5
Vega et al., 2018 [33]	4	4	10	0	5	10	5
Wegrzyn et al., 2010 [5]	0	10	10	0	5	10	5
Yeoman et al., 2012 [34]	0	0	10	10	5	10	5