Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 9;11(1):146. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010146

Table 2.

Summary of study details of included studies. Full-text articles are marked with asterisks. All data, except safety, are presented for TNBC cohort of each trial.

Vaccine Name Study # Patients (VG 1:CG 2) Dosing, Route, Intervals Follow-up Duration (m 3/w 4/d 5) Key Observations (Efficacy) Key Observations (Safety)
AE37 Brown et al., 2020 * 45 (21:24) AE37 (500 µg) + GM-CSF (125 µg), x6 q3-4w (VG)/
GM-CSF (125 µg) x6 q3-4w (CG)
ID 6
4 boosters q6m
59.9 m No statistically significant difference in 5-y 7 DFS 8 (p = 0.226, HR 9 = 0.443);
signs of DFS improvement for advanced-stage TNBC patients (p = 0.078, HR = 0.184)
Safe and well-tolerated, majority of AE 10s of grade 1, no >grade 3 toxicities
Peace et al., 2017 42 (21:21) 55 m Statistically significant difference in DFS (p = 0.0478, HR = 0.26) Safe and well-tolerated, no >grade 3 AEs
Peace et al., 2017 N/S 46.7 m Signs of DFS improvement for advanced-stage TNBC patients (p = 0.054) N/S 11
Mittendorf et al., 2016 * 50 (25:25) 25 m No statistically significant difference in 5-y DFS (p = 0.12, HR = 0.403) Maximum local AEs grade 1/2, no >grade 3 systemic AEs
Greene et al., 2015 51 (25:26) N/S No statistically significant difference in 5-y DFS (p = 0.65, HR = 0.42) N/S
Mittendorf et al., 2014 50 (25:25) N/S No statistically significant difference in 5-y DFS (p = 0.12, HR = 0.40) Safe and well-tolerated, no grade 3 local AEs, 1 pt 12 had grade 3 systemic AE
Mittendorf et al., 2012 36 (13:23) 22.3 m No statistically significant difference in 5-y DFS (p = 0.23) N/S
GP2 Brown et al., 2020 * N/S GP2 (500 µg) + GM-CSF (125 µg), x6 q3-4w (VG)/
GM-CSF (125 µg), x6 q3-4w (CG)
ID
4 boosters q6m
41.7 m No statistically significant difference in RR 13 (HR~1.42) Safe and well-tolerated, majority of AESs of grade 1, no >grade 3 AEs
Trappey et al., 2013 N/S 24 m No statistically significant difference in RR (p = 0.251) Maximum local and systemic AEs similar between groups, no grade 3 systemic AEs
Nelipepimut-S Chick et al., 2021 * 99 (55:44) trastuzumab (LD 14 8mg/kg, MD 15 6 mg/kg) q3w for 1 y + NPS (1000 µg) + GM-CSF (250 µg), x6 q3w, starting with 3rd trastuzumab dose (VG)/
trastuzumab (LD 8mg/kg, MD 6 mg/kg) q3w for 1 y + GM-CSF (250 µg), x6 q3w, starting with 3rd trastuzumab dose (CG)
ID
4 boosters q6m
36 m Statistically significant differences in 36-m DFS of total pts (p = 0.01, HR = 0.25), HER2 IHC 16 1+ pts (p = 0.01, HR = 0.17), HLA-A24+ pts (p < 0.01, HR = 0.08), pts with prior NAC 17 (p < 0.01, HR = 0.21) N/S
Clifton et al., 2020 * 97 (53:44) 26.1 m Statistically significant difference in 24-m DFS (p = 0.01, HR = 0.25) Safe and well-tolerated, no added cardiac or overall AEs, no grade 4/5 AEs
Clifton et al., 2019 97 (53:44) N/S Statistically significant difference in 36-m DFS of pts (p = 0.013, HR = 0.262), pts with prior NAC (p = 0.013, HR= 0.226), HER2 IHC 1+ pts (p= 0.014, HR= 0.178), ≥51 y-old pts (p= 0.004, HR= 0.144), stage I/II pts (p = 0.006) N/S
Hickerson et al., 2019 N/S 25.7 m Statistically significant difference in 24-m DFS (p = 0.013, HR = 0.26) Safe, no added cardiac or overall AEs, no grade 4/5 AEs
Hickerson et al., 2019 N/S 19.4 m Statistically significant difference in 24-m DFS (p = 0.02, HR = 0.26) Safe, no grade 4/5 AEs
Hale et al., 2018 N/S 18.8 m Statistically significant difference in 24-m DFS in total (HR = 0.29) and HLA-A24+ pts (p = 0.02, HR = 0.08) N/S
Tecemotide Singer et al., 2020 * 116 (62:54) E 18 C 19 (90 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2 q3w, respectively), and D 20 (100 mg/m2, 3qw) or vice-versa, x4 + cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) 3 days before vaccine + tecemotide (930 µg), x8 qw (VG)/
EC (90 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2 q3w, respectively), and D (100 mg/m2, 3qw) or vice-versa, x4 (CG)
SC 21
1 booster 2-3 weeks after last cycle
29.5 w No statistically significant differences in either RCB 22 or pCR 23 (data not disclosed) No different AEs between CG and VC, except for injection site AEs
AS/OBI-821 Huang et al., 2020 * 45 (28:17) cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) 3 days before vaccine at weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 25, 37 + AS/OBI-821 (30 µg/100 µg) at weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 25, 37 (VG)/
cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) 3 days before vaccine at weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 25, 37 + placebo at weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 25, 37 (CG)
SC
22.3 m No statistically significant differences in PFS 24 All injection-site and most non-injection site AEs of grade 1/2, 2 hypersensitivity and 1 fever cases in VG
PVX-410
Isakoff et al., 2022 19 (nr 25) pembrolizumab 200 mg, q3w starting at 2nd vaccine dose+ PVX-410 (800 µg), x5 qw
2 boosters at w10 and 28
SC
36.8 m PFS = 2.3 m, OS 26 = 2.3 m; best overall response was SD 27 in 47% of pts, CBR 28 = 31.6%, no pts had CR 29 /PR 30 Mostly grade 2 AEs, 2 grade 3 and 1 grade 4 AEs were attributable to pembrolizumab, no grade 5 AEs
Isakoff et al., 2020 22 (nr) durvalumab 1500 mg, x2, with 4th and 6th vaccine doses + PVX-410 (800 µg), x6 q2w
SC
15.4 m PVX-specific responses in 10/12 pts up to w 14 and persisted up to 6 m;
1/22 pt had local and 3/22 pts had metastatic recurrence, 2/22 pts died
No DLT 31 s, mostly injection site AEs, 2 grade 3 diarrhea and hyponatremia, respectively, no grade 4/5 AEs
H/K-HELP Nishimura et al., 2011 N/S H/K-HELP x4 q2w
SC
N/S Complete regression of resistant cervical node recurrence in TNBC pt N/S
Ohtake et al., 2014 * 1 71 d
Personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) Toh et al., 2012 8 (nr) 1st cycle: PPV (3mg/each peptide), x6 qw;
2nd cycle: PPV (with re-selected peptides, 3 mg/each peptide), x6 q2w
3rd cycle: PPV (with re-selected peptides, 3 mg/each peptide), q4-8w
continued until disease progression
SC
N/S Total population: 2 pts had CR and 1 pt had PR; no significant difference between TNBC and other subtypes in clinical responses No vaccine-related SAE 32 s
Takahashi et al., 2012 8 (nr) N/S 6/8 pts received ≥6 vaccine doses;
5/6 pts reached SD, 1/6 pt reached CR
N/S
Toh et al., 2013 14 (nr) 20.7 m Median PFS and OS of TNBC were 8.3 m and 12 m, respectively No vaccine-related SAEs
Takahashi et al., 2014 * 18 (nr) N/S 1/18 pt had CR, 1/18 pt had PR; median PFS 7.5 m, median OS 11.1 m; no significant PFS and OS difference between PPV mono (16 pts)/combination chemotherapy (2 pts) (p = 0.467 and 0.347, respectively) No vaccine-related SAEs
KRM-19 Toh et al., 2020 * 14 (nr) KRM-19 (19 mg/mL, 1 mg of each peptide), x6 qw
SC
12 m 6/14 pts had SD, 8/14 had PD 33; median PFS: 1.5 m in 14/14 pts, and 5.8 m in 10/14 pts completing vaccination series; median OS: 11.5 m in 14/14 pts, and 24.4 m in 10/14 pts completing vaccination Most commonly injection site AEs (9 pts) and lymphocytopenia (4 pts), 5 pts with grade 3, 0 with grade 4, and 2 with grade 5 AEs
Toh et al., 2017 10 (nr) N/S 1/8 pt had PR, 4/8 pts had SD, 3/8 pts had PD; 12.5% ORR 34, 62.5% CBR 10/10 pts had grade 1/2 injection site AEs, 5/10 pts had grade 2/3 liver function disorder, 3/10 pts had grade 2 bone marrow suppression, 1/10 pt had grade 2 nausea
Multipeptide active immunotherapy Marquez-Manriquez et al., 2018 10 (nr) oxaliplatin + doxorubicin (low-dose), x4 q2w + 22 peptides, x4 qw
SC
N/S All pts entered remission according to CT 35, all pts had significant CD8 response against all peptides Well-tolerated in all pts, minimal injection site AEs
Tumor lysate-pulsed DC 36 vaccine Santisteban et al., 2021 * 30 (nr) (17:13) NAC (dd 37 EC x4 → D x4) + DCV 38, x5 q3w+ x1 the day after surgery + RT 39+ DCV, x4 q2m (VG)/NAC (ddEC x4 → D x4) (CG)
ID
8 y TNBC pts: pCR 50% (VG) vs. 30.7% (CG); p = 0.255 No difference in grade 3/4 NAC AEs between groups, no grade ≥ 3 vaccine-relate AEs
Elarre et al., 2016 30 (nr) N/S TNBC pts: pCR 67% (VG) vs. 17% (CG); increased TIL 40s observed in TNBC pts unlike other subtypes (p = 0.01) N/S
Urrizola et al., 2020 N/S 7.52 y Total pts (83): statistically significant pCR improvement (p = 0.03)
TNBC pts: pCR 50.0% (VG) vs. 30.7% (CG)
No difference in grade 3/4 NAC AEs between groups, no grade ≥ 3 vaccine-relate AEs
Antigen-loaded DC vaccine O’Shaughnessy et al., 2020 10 (nr) ddA 41 C + T 42 Cb 43 + DCV (x4 pre-surgery, x3 post-surgery)
IT 44, SC
N/S 4/10 pts achieved pCR, 3/10 pts had local macroscopic residual disease, 3/10 pts had MRD 45 N/S
Palucka et al., 2018 10 (nr) 12 All pts received 4 pre-surgery doses, 7/10 pts received all vaccine doses; 4/10 pts achieved pCR, 3/10 pts had local macroscopic residual disease, 3/10 pts had MRD N/S
O’Shaughnessy et al., 2016 10 (nr) N/S All pts received 4 pre-surgery doses, 4/10 pts received all vaccine doses; 5/10 pts achieved pCR, 3/10 pts had local macroscopic residual disease, 2/10 pts had MRD 9/10 pts had grade 1/2 injection site AEs
RO7198457 (iNEST) Lopez et al., 2020 24 (nr) atezolizumab (1200 mg) q3w+ RO7198457, x9 q1/2w for 12w (induction stage) and q24w (maintenance stage) N/S ORR = 4% in the TNBC cohort, and 8% in total pt population (108) Majority of AEs of grade 1/2, no DLTs
p53MVA Chung et al., 2019 * 7 (nr) p53MVA (5.6*108 pfu 46), x3 q3w + pembrolizumab (200 mg), x7 q3w
IM 47
N/S 1/7 pt failing all prior therapy lines had regression of cutaneous metastases (pCR), 5/7 pts were removed from the study due to PD at week 10, 1/7 pt had SD for 30 w 1/11 pts grade 3 adrenal insufficiency, 2/11 pts LFT 48 rise, 1/11 pts grade 5 myocarditis (all mainly related to pembrolizumab)
Chung et al., 2018 N/S N/S 1 pt had durable p53-specific CD8 responses along with pCR and SD for >6 m, 1 pt was on study for 35 w, 2 pts had rapidly PD N/S
Yuan et al., 2017 * 1 (case report) 33 w Sustained (6 m) and complete regression of cutaneous metastases after 9 w of treatment, minimal dermal relapse at week 33 Grade 2 nausea, grade 1 vomiting, grade 1 skin rash (possibly related to pembrolizumab)
NANT cancer vaccine (NCV) Nangia et al., 2019 9 (nr) Low-dose metronomic chemoradiation + N-803 +PD-L1 49 inhibitor + haNK cells 50 + NCV (3w cycle)
N/S route of administration
N/S DCR 51 = 78% (7/9 pts with CR + PR + SD); ORR = 56% (5/9 pts with PR + CR); CR in 2 pts (22%) 4/9 pts had 8 grade ≥3 AEs (of which 2 pts had haNK-associated SAEs)
Nangia et al., 2019 8 (nr) N/S 1/8 pt had CR, 2/8 pts had PR all pts had at least 1 grade ≥3 AEs, 2/8 pts had grade ≥ 3 haNK-associated AEs
Carlson et al., 2018 3 (nr) N/S 2/3 pts had PR 4 hematologic DLT’s were observed and managed with dose reduction of cisplatin
Elenagen Ponomarenko et al., 2020 * 1 (case report) Elenagen (1 mg), x5 qw, then q3w until disease progression ± CM 52 F 53 (C 600 mg/m2, M 40 mg/m2, F 600 mg/m2), days 1st and 8th q2w
IM
N/S PFS = 19 w, 33% partial tumor regression Grade ½ nausea, grade 2/3 leukopenia and neutropenia
Ponomarenko et al., 2017 * 4 (nr) N/S In monotherapy: 2/4 pts had PD; 2/4 pts had SD for 8 & 32 w; in Elenagen + CMF: prolongation of SD in pts with PD (for 24 w) or those with SD (24 w) Safe with no DLTs/SAEs, only grade 1 injection site AEs, nausea, fatigue, fever

1 VG: vaccine group; 2 CG: control group; 3 m: month; 4 w: week; 5 d: day; 6 ID: intradermal; 7 y: year; 8 DFS: disease-free survival; 9 HR: hazard ratio; 10 AE: adverse event; 11 N/S: not specified; 12 pt: patient; 13 RR: recurrence risk; 14 LD: loading dose; 15 MD: maintenance dose; 16 IHC: immunohistochemistry; 17 NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 18 E: epirubicin; 19 C: cyclophosphamide; 20 D: docetaxel; 21 SC: subcutaneous; 22 RCB: residual cancer burden; 23 pCR: pathological complete response; 24 PFS: progression-free survival; 25 nr: non-randomized; 26 OS: overall survival; 27 SD: stable disease; 28 CBR: clinical benefit rate; 29 CR: complete response; 30 PR: partial response; 31 DLT: dose-limiting toxicity; 32 SAE: severe adverse event; 33 PD: progressive disease; 34 ORR: objective response rate; 35 CT: computed tomography; 36 DC: dendritic cell; 37 dd: dose-dense; 38 DCV: dendritic cell vaccination; 39 RT: radiotherapy; 40 TIL: tumor infiltrating lymphocyte; 41 A: doxorubicin; 42 T: paclitaxel; 43 Cb: carboplatin; 44 IT: intratumoral; 45 MRD: microscopic residual disease; 46 pfu: plaque-forming units; 47 IM: intramuscular; 48 LFT: liver function test; 49 PD-L1: programmed death-ligand 1; 50 ha-NK cells: high-affinity natural killer cells; 51 DCR: disease control rate; 52 M: methotrexate; 53 F: fluorouracil.