Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;24(2):1118. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021118

Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate analysis using clinicopathological characteristics and Cit-H3 expression for RFS in 133 CRC patients.

Variables Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
HR 95% CI p HR 95% CI p
Age, years (<68 vs. ≥68) 1.02 0.48–2.17 0.96
Sex (male vs. female) 0.57 0.24–1.35 0.2
Location (colon vs. rectum) 1.99 0.95–4.19 0.069 1.71 0.75–3.92 0.2
T factor (Tis-T2 vs. T3-T4) 1.99 0.76–5.24 0.16
n factor (negative vs. positive) 4.86 2.2–10.77 < 0.0001 3.26 1.38–7.70 0.0071
Lymphatic invasion (ly0 vs. ≥ly1) 3.69 1.67–8.17 0.0013 2.01 0.84–4.80 0.12
Venous invasion (v0 vs. ≥v1) 2.03 0.92–4.48 0.08 1.33 0.57–3.08 0.51
Preoperative therapy (no vs. yes) 4.68 1.77–12.37 0.0019 2.04 0.67–6.21 0.21
Adjuvant therapy (no vs. yes) 1.35 0.64–2.84 0.43
NLR (<3 vs. ≥3) 1.05 0.47–2.32 0.91
CEA (ng/mL, <5 vs. ≥5) 1.34 0.63–2.81 0.44
CA19-9 (U/mL, <37 vs. ≥37) 1.94 0.73–5.11 0.21
Cit-H3 expression (low vs. high) 2.86 1.26–6.49 0.012 2.86 1.25–6.54 0.013

NLR, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; CEA, carcinoembrionic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.