Table 1.
Quality assessment of the selected studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies.
Study | Askling et al. 2002 [32] | Card et al. 2004 [33] | Goldacre et al. 2008 [34] | Landgren et al. 2011 [35] | Elfstrom et al. 2012 [31] | Ilus et al. 2014 [36] | Koskinen et al. 2020 [37] | Lebwohl et al. 2022 [30] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SELECTION (maximum four) | Representativeness of The Exposed Cohort | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Selection of The Non-Exposed Cohort | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Ascertainment of Exposure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
No Outcome of Interest at Start of The Study | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
COMPARABILITY (maximum two) | Controlled for confounders | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
OUTCOME (maximum three) | Assessment of outcome | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Follow-Up Long Enough for Outcomes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Adequacy of Follow Up of Cohorts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Score | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 |