Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Behav Med. 2022 Jun 13;30(3):307–319. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10101-w

Table 2.

Unstandardized Regression Coefficients from Within-person Mediation Model

Path Estimate CI p
Model 1
C1 (verbal immediacy → SE) −0.75 −1.86 – 0.35 0.180
C2 (we → SE) 0.07 −0.36 – 0.51 0.734
Model 2
A1 (verbal immediacy → neg affect) 0.12 0.01 – 0.22 0.030
A2 (we → neg affect) −0.00 −0.05 – 0.04 0.857
B (neg affect → SE) 0.43 −0.66 – 1.51 0.440
C’1 (verbal immediacy → SE) −0.81 −1.89 – 0.28 0.144
C’2 (we → SE) 0.13 −0.29 – 0.55 0.556
time trend: neg affect 0.11 0.15 – −0.06 <0.001
time trend: SE −0.10 −0.59 – 0.38 0.684

Note. we = we-talk; SE = sleep efficiency; neg affect = negative affect; CI = 95% confidence interval. Bolded paths are statistically significant.