Table 4.

Unstandardized Regression Coefficients from Lagged Mediation Model

Path	Estimate	CI	p
Model 1
C1w (imm_w → SE)	3.81	−0.69 – 8.32	0.097
C1wL (imm_wL → SE)	2.35	−1.45 – 6.16	0.225
C1b (imm_b → SE)	−3.24	−5.65 – −0.83	0.008
C2w (we_w → SE)	−1.34	−3.25 – 0.58	0.171
C2wL (we_wL → SE)	0.34	−1.27 – 1.94	0.681
C2b (we_b → SE)	0.64	−0.50 – 1.78	0.270
Model 2
A1w (imm_w → neg affect)	0.06	−0.15 – 0.27	0.580
A1wL (imm_wL → neg affect)	0.01	−0.17 – 0.19	0.934
A1b (imm_b → neg affect)	0.14	−0.06 – 0.35	0.169
A2w (we_w → neg affect)	−0.02	−0.11 – 0.07	0.604
A2wL (we_wL → neg affect)	−0.06	−0.13 – 0.01	0.089
A2b (we_b → neg affect)	0.04	−0.06 – 0.13	0.474
Bw (neg_w→ SE)	1.43	−3.11 – 5.97	0.536
BwL (neg_wL→ SE)	1.49	−2.44 – 5.43	0.458
Bb (neg_b→ SE)	−2.44	−4.79 – −0.09	0.042
C1’w (imm_w→ SE)	2.50	−2.42 – 7.43	0.319
C1’wL (imm_wL→ SE)	1.97	−2.01 – 5.94	0.332
C1’b (imm_b → SE)	−3.12	−5.66 – −0.58	0.016
C2’w (we_w→ SE)	−1.41	−3.32 – 0.50	0.148
C2’wL (we_wL→ SE)	0.47	−1.15 – 2.10	0.568
C2’b (we_b → SE)	0.61	−0.52 – 1.75	0.291
time trend: neg affect	−0.12	−0.23 – −0.00	0.043
time trend: SE	1.79	−1.57 – 5.16	0.296

Note. C = total C path; A = A path; B = B path; C’ = direct C path; imm_w = verbal immediacy within-person effect; imm_wL = verbal immediacy within-person lagged effect; imm_b = verbal immediacy between-person effect; neg_w = negative affect within-person effect; neg_wL = negative affect within-person lagged effect; neg_b = negative affect between-person effect; SE = sleep efficiency; neg affect = negative affect; CI = 95% confidence interval. Bolded paths are statistically significant.