Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2022 Sep 28;50(1):89–103. doi: 10.1002/mp.15958

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Sample synthetic projections at three consecutive Angles 2, 3, 4. The error maps between the synthetic and ground-truth corresponding projections are shown below each image. CUSIP and CUSP-DuRDN show obvious under-estimations in all angles, especially at the central cardiac regions. DuDoSS predicts the most consistent projections in all Angles 2, 3, and 4 compared with the ground-truth projections. Errors between the predicted and ground-truth projections are denoted with white arrows.