Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 2;72(4):297–305. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.21101

Table 2.

Agronomic traits of ‘Kitami-94’ grown in several WYMV non-infested fields

Test field Line and cultivar name Heading date Maturity date Stem length (cm) Spike length (cm) Number of spikes (per m2) Grain yield (kg ha–1) 1000-grain weight (g) Test weight (g) Seeds protein (%)
Chuo AES Kitami-94 6.01 7.18 85 9.2 806 8336 36.6 Inline graphic** 823 Inline graphic** 9.4
Kitahonami 6.01 7.17 86 9.2 793 8183 38.8 830 9.6
Kamikawa AES Kitami-94 6.04 7.18 74 8.6 458 5545 39.3 Inline graphic* 829 Inline graphic** 9.5
Kitahonami 6.04 7.18 74 8.7 460 5568 41.3 834 9.5
Tokachi AES Kitami-94 6.01 7.23 78 Inline graphic** 8.9 713 6435 40.0 Inline graphic** 849 Inline graphic** 11.1
Kitahonami 6.02 7.23 81 8.9 665 6484 42.2 859 11.2
Kitami AES Kitami-94 6.06 7.26 78 Inline graphic** 8.6 717 8866 40.4 Inline graphic* 839 9.8 Inline graphic*
Kitahonami 6.05 7.26 80 8.6 666 8691 42.3 844 10.0
Mean of 4 AES Kitami-94 6.02 7.21 79 8.8 674 7295 39.1 835 9.9
Kitahonami 6.03 7.21 80 8.9 646 7232 41.1 842 10.1

Data are means of the results from 2017–2020.

*,** Significantly different at the 5% and 1% levels, respectively (Student’s t-test).