Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 31;9(4):712–719. doi: 10.5455/javar.2022.i640

Table 2. Effects of herbal rations on production performance of broilers.

Variables CT-R Herbal rations SEM p-value
LG-R SM-R LS-R
FBW (gm/b) 1,496.43 ± 25.94 1,548.41 ± 22.22 1,520.24 ± 19.29 1,538.23 ± 24.47 8.235 0.100
BWG (gm/b) 1,450.56b ± 24.32 1,502.15a ± 20.89 1,474.11ab ± 17.89 1,492.36ab ± 22.84 7.964 0.078
FI (gm/b) 2,755.10a ± 19.50 2,754.95a ± 44.64 2,672.65b ± 25.95 2,701.03ab ± 32.21 13.29 0.031
FCR 1.89a ± 0.03 1.83b ± 0.01 1.82b ± 0.01 1.81b ± 0.01 0.011 0.001
PEF (%) 218.25b ± 7.15 234.02a ± 2.97 232.30a ± 3.46 235.59a ± 4.65 2.398 0.008
DY (%) 57.39c ± 0.38 59.81b ± 0.51 61.65a ± 0.53 62.36a ± 0.46 0.591 0.001

CT-R: Corn-soya based basal ration, LG-R: CT-R + 1.0% fresh lemongrass on DM basis, SM-R: CT-R + 1.0% fresh spearmint on DM basis, LS-R: CT-R + 0.5% fresh lemongrass and 0.5% fresh spearmint on DM basis, FBW: Final body weight, BWG: Body weight gain, FI: Feed intake, FCR: Feed conversion ratio, PEF: Production efficiency factor, DY: Dressing yield, gm: Gram, b: Bird, %: Percentage, SEM: Standard error mean.

a–c Means values with dissimilar superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).