. 2023 Jan 23;21(1):e07765. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7765

Table 2.

Groundwater ^(a)

Compound (name and/or code)	> 0.1 μg/L at 1 m depth for the representative uses ^(b) Step 2	Biological (pesticidal) activity/relevance Step 3a	Hazard identified Steps 3b and 3c	Consumer RA triggered Steps 4 and 5	Human health relevance
(3E)‐dec‐3‐en‐2‐one	Yes Route of exposure via volatilisation and deposition following ventilation: 1/9 FOCUS scenarios (0.133 μg/L) Route of exposure from the application of sewage sludge: using the lowest adsorption endpoint: 9/9 FOCUS scenarios (0.153–2.30 μg/L); using the highest adsorption endpoint: 8/9 FOCUS scenarios (0.120–2.34 μg/L)	Yes	–	–	Yes

Compound (name and/or code)

> 0.1 μg/L at 1 m depth for the representative uses ^(b)

Step 2

Biological (pesticidal) activity/relevance

Step 3a

Hazard identified Steps 3b and 3c

Consumer RA triggered

Steps 4 and 5

Human health relevance

(3E)‐dec‐3‐en‐2‐one

Yes

Route of exposure via volatilisation and deposition following ventilation: 1/9 FOCUS scenarios (0.133 μg/L)

Route of exposure from the application of sewage sludge:

using the lowest adsorption endpoint: 9/9 FOCUS scenarios (0.153–2.30 μg/L);

using the highest adsorption endpoint: 8/9 FOCUS scenarios (0.120–2.34 μg/L)

Yes

–

Yes

^(a)

Assessment according to European Commission guidance of the relevance of groundwater metabolites (2003a).

^(b)

FOCUS scenarios or relevant lysimeter. Ranges indicated for FOCUS scenarios include the result from the model giving the highest concentration at each scenario, as needed to comply with European Commission, 2014.