Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 23;23:37. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02753-1

Table 3.

The numbers and percentages of individual tooth agenesis in males and females

Tooth number Gender Total tooth number Ranking (frequency) Chi-square value P value Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) P valuec
Males Females
n (% of males) n (% of females) n (% of total)
#11 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
#12 8 (21.6) 11 (17.2) 19 (8.6) 4th 0.302 0.583a 0.74 (0.27–2.05) 0.560
#13 1 (2.7) 2 (3.1) 3 (1.4) 13th 1.000b 1.44 (0.12–17.16) 0.773
#14 3 (8.1) 7 (10.9) 10 (4.5) 8th 0.742b 1.51 (0.36–6.34) 0.575
#15 5 (13.5) 5 (7.8) 10 (4.5) 8th 0.491b 0.53 (0.14–1.97) 0.342
#16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
#17 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
#21 1 (2.7) 1 (1.6) 2 (0.9) 14th 1.000b 0.83 (0.05–14.48) 0.900
#22 10 (27.0) 6 (9.4) 16 (7.3) 6th 5.48 0.019a 0.26 (0.09–0.81) 0.020
#23 0 (0) 1 (1.6) 1 (0.5) 15th 1.000b - -
#24 3 (8.1) 7 (10.9) 10 (4.5) 8th 0.742b 1.42 (0.34–5.88) 0.631
#25 5 (13.5) 7 (10.9) 12 (5.4) 7th 0.755b 0.81 (0.24–2.78) 0.737
#26 1 (2.7) 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 15th 0.366b
#27 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
#31 3 (8.1) 2 (3.1) 5 (2.3) 12th 0.353b 0.35 (0.05–2.21) 0.263
#32 5 (13.5) 13 (20.3) 18 (8.2) 5th 0.74 0.390a 1.63 (0.53–5.00) 0.398
#33 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
#34 2 (5.4) 7 (10.9) 9 (4.1) 9th 0.480b 2.28 (0.44–11.76) 0.324
#35 11 (29.7) 16 (25.0) 27 (12.3) 3rd 0.268 0.605a 0.79 (0.32–1.95) 0.607
#36 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
#37 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
#41 3 (8.1) 4 (6.3) 7 (3.2) 10th 0.705b 0.73 (0.15–3.49) 0.698
#42 7 (18.9) 26 (40.6) 33 (15) 1st 5.022 0.025a 2.90 (1.11–7.61) 0.030
#43 1 (2.7) 2 (3.1) 3 (1.4) 13th 1.000b 1.77 (0.15–21.47) 0.656
#44 3 (8.1) 3 (4.7) 6 (2.7) 11th 0.666b 0.57 (0.11–3.01) 0.509
#45 11 (29.7) 17 (26.6) 28 (12.7) 2nd 0.117 0.732a 0.86 (0.35–2.10) 0.734
#46 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
#47 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Total n (% of total) 83 (37.7) 137 (62.3) 220 (100)

aChi-square test. bFisher exact test. A significant difference (P < 0.05) indicates in bold italics

cMultivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted by age. The male gender was the reference group