Table 2.

Total, direct and indirect effect of each path

	Direct	S.e.	Significance		Indirect	S.e.	Significance
			Percentile 95% CI	Bias-corrected 95% CI			Percentile 95% CI	Bias-corrected 95% CI
AL → Trust	0.890	0.018	0.002	0.003
AL → Flow	0.514	0.047	0.002	0.002
AL → OI	0.181	0.089	0.039	0.041	0.450	0.079	0.002	0.001
AL → ER	0.360	0.050	0.002	0.002	0.299	0.034	0.002	0.002
Trust → OI	0.359	0.088	0.002	0.001
Trust → ER	0	0	...	...	0.056	0.017	0.002	0.002
Flow → OI	0.255	0.054	0.002	0.002
Flow → ER	0.390	0.052	0.002	0.002	0.040	0.017	0.002	0.001
OI → ER	0.156	0.048	0.002	0.002

Note. AL: authentic leadership, OI: organizational identification, ER: employee resilience. Total, direct, and indirect, respectively, means total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect. There are two kinds of significance level, the left one is based in percentile method 95% (two-tailed), and the right one is based in bias-corrected percentile method 95% (BC, two-tailed). p < 0.01 indicates significant inspection.