Table 4.

Performance comparison of LTMD and R-LTMD in terms of Type I error ( $\tilde{\alpha }$ %) and Power values ( $\widetilde{\mathrm{\text{β}}}$ %) under different choices of k, ψ or v, when n = 100, p = 500, $\alpha =0.05$, and m = 0.4 in Case (b) and Case (d).

		$n_0=0.1n$				$n_0=0.2n$
		LTMD		R-LTMD		LTMD		R-LTMD
Case	k, ψ, v	$\tilde{\alpha }$	$\widetilde{\mathrm{\text{β}}}$	$\tilde{\alpha }$	$\widetilde{\mathrm{\text{β}}}$	$\tilde{\alpha }$	$\widetilde{\mathrm{\text{β}}}$	$\tilde{\alpha }$	$\widetilde{\mathrm{\text{β}}}$
a	k = 2	16.3	98.4	6.0	93.7	15.2	98.0	5.4	92.0
	k = 3	15.6	100.0	5.5	100.0	15.4	100.0	5.6	100.0
	k = 4	16.1	100.0	5.8	100.0	15.2	100.0	5.6	100.0
b	k = 10	14.3	100.0	5.0	100.0	14.1	87.6	4.9	86.5
	k = 15	14.7	100.0	5.3	100.0	14.4	83.4	5.0	81.8
	k = 20	14.8	100.0	5.2	100.0	14.1	83.1	4.9	81.4
c	$\psi =2$	15.8	98.6	5.5	94.4	16.0	99.0	6.1	93.0
	$\psi =3$	15.6	100.0	5.6	100.0	15.3	100.0	6.0	100.0
	$\psi =4$	16.0	100.0	5.9	100.0	15.8	100.0	5.8	100.0
d	$\psi =10$	15.6	96.4	5.5	94.8	15.1	96.0	6.3	93.7
	$\psi =15$	16.2	99.5	6.0	99.1	15.5	99.7	6.6	99.4
	$\psi =20$	16.3	99.9	6.0	99.7	15.6	99.9	6.2	99.8
e	v = 1	15.9	100.0	5.8	100.0	14.5	100.0	6.1	100.0
	v = 3	15.6	100.0	5.5	100.0	15.3	100.0	6.5	100.0
	v = 5	16.5	100.0	5.9	100.0	15.5	99.9	6.5	99.4
f	v = 1	15.4	100.0	5.4	100.0	15.1	100.0	6.2	100.0
	v = 3	16.0	100.0	5.7	100.0	15.0	100.0	6.3	100.0
	v = 5	16.5	100.0	6.0	100.0	15.2	100.0	6.0	100.0