Table 2.
Comparison of different classification methods.
| Normal | Benign | in situ carcinoma | Invasive carcinoma | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Accuracy | P | R | P | R | P | R | P | R | |
| Supervised | VGG (9) | 56.3 ( ± 10.9) | 60.0 | 60.0 | 61.1 | 55.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 62.5 | 45.5 |
| Inception (26) | 71.3 ( ± 9.9) | 68.4 | 65.0 | 71.4 | 75.0 | 68.1 | 75.0 | 66.7 | 77.8 | |
| ResNet101 (44) | 86.3 ( ± 7.5) | 89.4 | 85.0 | 81.8 | 90.0 | 80.9 | 85.0 | 94.4 | 85.0 | |
| Semi-supervised | Pseudo-Labeling (30) | 61.3 ( ± 10.7) | 57.9 | 55.0 | 61.9 | 65.0 | 52.4 | 55.0 | 73.7 | 70.0 |
| Mean Teacher (48) | 70.0 ( ± 10.0) | 66.7 | 70.0 | 68.4 | 65.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 75.0 | |
| MixMatch (49) | 87.5 ( ± 7.2) | 90.0 | 90.0 | 80.9 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 94.7 | 90.0 | |
| FixMatch (14) | 87.5 ( ± 7.2) | 94.4 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 85.0 | 81.8 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | |
| Semi-His-Net | 90.0 (± 6.6) | 90.0 | 90.0 | 89.4 | 85.0 | 85.7 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 95.0 | |
We show the average Accuracy with a 95% confidence interval in parentheses, Precision (P) and recall (R) (%) of four subtypes: normal tissue, benign abnormality, malignant carcinoma in situ, and malignant invasive carcinoma. Bold font indicates best result obtained for predictions.