Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 23;13:5. doi: 10.1186/s13550-023-00953-y

Table 3.

Estimates of the SMD as summary measure for the difference in [18F]FDG (SUVmax) uptake between clinical subtypes according to a simplified classification

Comparisons Studies Patients Meta-analysis Subgroup Egger
No I2 (%) SMD 95% CI P P
Primary analyses
 ER+/HER2− versus HER2+ 5 755 302 0.0  − 0.34  − 0.53, − 0.16 0.0070 0.2633
 ER+/HER2− versus TNBC 6 814 309 56.1  − 0.89  − 1.20, − 0.58 0.0008 0.0247
 HER2+ versus TNBC 5 302 291 64.7  − 0.54  − 0.93, − 0.14 0.0193 0.3140
Sensitivity analyses
 ER+/HER2− versus HER2+ 8 1153 416 30.9  − 0.38  − 0.56, − 0.20 0.0016 0.3985 0.7816
 ER+/HER2− versus TNBC 9 1212 424 43.0  − 0.91  − 1.10, − 0.73  < 0.0001 0.3252 0.0246
 HER2+ versus TNBC 8 416 406 22.9  − 0.50  − 0.76, − 0.24 0.0025 0.6884 0.5186

Data derived from the primary and sensitivity analyses are presented

CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; SMD, standardized mean difference; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer