Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 23;10:5. doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00526-x

Table 3.

Quantification errors between activity concentrations calculated with the conventional method and with the SBVR method for different time per view settings (minus sign – overestimation)

Sphere volume (VOI volume) [cc] Phantom NEMA Val. acquisition validation
Quantification error (%)
Time per view: 30-s Time per view: 20-s Time per view: 10-s
SBVR Method (CF/ SBVR) Conv. Method (CF) SBVR Method (CF/ SBVR) Conv. Method (CF) SBVR Method (CF/ SBVR) Conv. Method (CF)
26.52 (22.7 cc) 0.16% (4.07/12.16) − 3.65% (3.92) 1.72% (4.07/12.07) − 1.78% (3.92) 4.56% (4.05/11.82) 1.39% (3.92)
11.49 (10.3 cc) 5.77% (3.15/8.90) 6.65% (3.19) 8.25% (3.13/8.71) 9.69% (3.19) 4.48% (3.19/9.32) 4.48% (3.19)
5.71 (6.36 cc) 9.34% (2.03/5.53) 30.28% (2.64) 8.84% (2.05/5.67) 29.19% (2.64) 4.41% (2.09/6.11) 24.32% (2.64)

VOI, Volume of interest; CF, Calibration factor [cps/MBq]; and SBVR, Sphere-to-background counts/voxel ratio