Table 1.
2D TTE | 2D TEE | Standard 3D TTE | Standard 3D TEE | Advanced 3D TTE | Advanced 3D TEE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feasibility | +++ | ++++ | +++ | ++++ | +++ | ++++ |
Accuracy in the evaluation of MV morphology | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ | +++ | ++++ |
Differentiation between simple and complex MV prolapse | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ | +++ | ++++ |
Characterization of MV leaflets texture | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++++ |
Chordal evaluation | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ |
Cleft detection | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ |
MA measurements | + | + | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
MR quantification | ++++ | ++++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
Accuracy in the identification of MR origin | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++++ |
2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; MA, mitral annulus; MR, mitral regurgitation; MV, mitral valve; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography. The role of 3DE in the evaluation of MVP is graded in symbols, in a scale from + to ++++.