Table 5.
Mediation test results, indirect effects of self-perceived victimization variables on subjective well-being dimensions, via cultural participation variables.
| Variables | Coef. a | OR | Std. Err. | z | p > |z| | [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic violence | |||||||
| via Attendance to Cognitive well-being | −0.0245 | 0.9757 | 0.0164 | −1.50 | 0.133 | −0.0566 | 0.0075 |
| via Engagement to Cognitive well-being | 0.0186 | 1.0187 | 0.0163 | 1.14 | 0.253 | −0.0133 | 0.0505 |
| via Consumption to Cognitive well-being | −0.0464 | 0.9547 | 0.0309 | −1.50 | 0.133 | −0.1068 | 0.0141 |
| via Attendance to Affective balance | −0.0293 | 0.9711 | 0.0182 | −1.61 | 0.107 | −0.0649 | 0.0063 |
| via Engagement to Affective balance | 0.0086 | 1.0086 | 0.0087 | 0.98 | 0.325 | −0.0085 | 0.0257 |
| via Consumption to Affective balance | −0.0220 | 0.9782 | 0.0156 | −1.41 | 0.158 | −0.0526 | 0.0085 |
| Total indirect effect on Cog. well-being | −0.0523 | 0.9490 | 0.0387 | −1.35 | 0.177 | −0.1281 | 0.0236 |
| Total indirect effect on Affective balance | −0.0427 | 0.9581 | 0.0256 | −1.67 | 0.095 | −0.0929 | 0.0074 |
| Total indirect effect of Domestic violence | −0.0950 | 0.9093 | 0.0617 | −1.54 | 0.123 | −0.2159 | 0.0258 |
| Community violence | |||||||
| via Attendance to Cognitive well-being | 0.0484** | 1.0496 | 0.0178 | 2.72 | 0.007 | 0.0135 | 0.0833 |
| via Engagement to Cognitive well-being | 0.0356* | 1.0362 | 0.0163 | 2.18 | 0.029 | 0.0037 | 0.0676 |
| via Consumption to Cognitive well-being | 0.0885*** | 1.0925 | 0.0244 | 3.62 | 0.000 | 0.0406 | 0.1365 |
| via Attendance to Affective balance | 0.0578*** | 1.0594 | 0.0159 | 3.63 | 0.000 | 0.0266 | 0.0890 |
| via Engagement to Affective balance | 0.0164 | 1.0165 | 0.0113 | 1.45 | 0.148 | −0.0058 | 0.0387 |
| via Consumption to Affective balance | 0.0421** | 1.0429 | 0.0154 | 2.73 | 0.006 | 0.0119 | 0.0723 |
| Total indirect effect on Cog. well-being | 0.1726*** | 1.1883 | 0.0317 | 5.44 | 0.000 | 0.1104 | 0.2347 |
| Total indirect effect on Affective balance | 0.1163*** | 1.1233 | 0.0226 | 5.15 | 0.000 | 0.0720 | 0.1606 |
| Total indirect effect of Comm. violence | 0.2889*** | 1.3349 | 0.0494 | 5.85 | 0.000 | 0.1921 | 0.3856 |
| Structural violence | |||||||
| via Attendance to Cognitive well-being | 0.0519** | 1.0533 | 0.0187 | 2.78 | 0.005 | 0.0154 | 0.0885 |
| via Engagement to Cognitive well-being | 0.0488* | 1.0499 | 0.0203 | 2.40 | 0.016 | 0.0090 | 0.0885 |
| via Consumption to Cognitive well-being | 0.0470* | 1.0481 | 0.0205 | 2.29 | 0.022 | 0.0068 | 0.0872 |
| via Attendance to Affective balance | 0.0620*** | 1.0639 | 0.0164 | 3.78 | 0.000 | 0.0299 | 0.0941 |
| via Engagement to Affective balance | 0.0225 | 1.0227 | 0.0149 | 1.51 | 0.132 | −0.0068 | 0.0518 |
| via Consumption to Affective balance | 0.0224* | 1.0226 | 0.0111 | 2.01 | 0.045 | 0.0005 | 0.0442 |
| Total indirect effect on Cog. well-being | 0.1477*** | 1.1591 | 0.0318 | 4.65 | 0.000 | 0.0854 | 0.2100 |
| Total indirect effect on Affective balance | 0.1068*** | 1.1127 | 0.0227 | 4.71 | 0.000 | 0.0624 | 0.1513 |
| Total indirect effect of Structural violence | 0.2545*** | 1.2898 | 0.0488 | 5.21 | 0.000 | 0.1588 | 0.3502 |
a, Unstandardized coefficient. Author’s elaboration. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.