Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 20;36(1):e100926. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2022-100926

Table 2.

Comparisons of resilience in college students by demographics

Items CD-RISC Tenacity Self-improvement Optimism
Gender Male (n=88) 56 (50, 69.50) 28 (24, 33.75) 20 (17, 24) 9 (8, 11)
Female (n=382) 56 (49, 65) 28 (24, 33) 20 (17, 23) 9 (8, 11)
Z value* −0.375 −0.218 −0.643 −0.021
P value 0.707 0.828 0.520 0.984
Home location City or town (n=254) 56.50 (49, 67) 28 (24, 34) 20 (17, 23) 9 (8, 11)
Countryside (n=216) 56 (50, 63.75) 28 (25, 31.75) 20 (17, 23) 9 (8, 11)
Z value* −0.745 −1.050 −0.216 −1.291
P value 0.456 0.294 0.829 0.197
Only-child family Yes (n=250) 56 (49, 65) 28 (25, 33) 20 (17, 23) 9 (8, 11)
No (n=220) 56 (49, 65.50) 27 (24, 33) 20 (17, 23) 9 (8, 11)
Z value −0.414 −0.766 −0.167 −0.309
P value 0.679 0.444 0.868 0.757
Academic performance Good (n=84) 56 (50, 65) 27 (24, 32.25) 18 (17, 23) 10 (8, 11)
Average (n=304) 56 (49.25, 64.75) 28 (24, 33) 20 (17, 23) 9 (8, 11)
Poor (n=82) 57 (48, 68) 28 (23, 34) 20 (17, 23) 9 (7, 11)
χ2 0.006 0.059 0.525 0.776
P value 0.997 0.971 0.769 0.678
Family income High (n=95) 59 (51, 69) 29 (26, 35) 20 (17, 23) 10 (8, 11)
Average (n=340) 56 (49, 64) 27.5 (24, 33) 20 (17, 23) 9 (8, 11)
Low (n=35) 55 (50, 71.75) 27 (24, 37.25) 20 (17, 23.75) 9 (8, 11)
χ2 2.752 4.151 0.700 2.289
P value 0.253 0.126 0.705 0.318
College grade level Grade 1 (n=155) 56 (48, 64) 27 (24, 32) 20 (16, 23) 9 (8, 11)
Grade 2 (n=113) 56 (50, 64) 28 (24, 32) 20 (16.50, 23) 9 (7, 11)
Grade 3 (n=95) 56 (51, 67) 28 (24, 34) 20 (17, 23) 10 (8, 11)
Grade 4 (n=56) 56.50 (49, 66) 28 (25, 33) 19.50 (17, 22.75) 9 (8, 11)
Grade 5 (n=51) 56 (50, 67) 28 (25, 35) 20 (17, 23) 9 (8, 10)
χ2 0.845 1.028 0.244 3.465
P value 0.932 0.905 0.993 0.483

Data are expressed as median (quartile 1, quartile 3).

*Mann-Whitney U test.

†Kruskal-Wallis test.

CD-RISC, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale.