Table 2.
Response of foliar application of Si fertilizer on the grain yield (g pot-1) of different varieties of rice.
| Rice Varieties | CK treatment | Si treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Yuehesimiao (YHSM) | 4.81 ± 1.04a | 6.50 ± 1.19a |
| Wuyou1179 (WY1179) | 12.14 ± 3.98a | 13.02 ± 0.13a |
| Yexiangyoulisi (YXYLS) | 11.26 ± 2.37a | 12.47 ± 1.24a |
| Jingliangyou1377 (JLY1377) | 11.29 ± 1.36a | 12.82 ± 1.63a |
| Meixiangzhan2 (MXZ2) | 9.30 ± 0.41a | 10.58 ± 2.94a |
| Yliangyou900 (YLY900) | 10.16 ± 1.80a | 10.61 ± 2.29a |
The data are shown as mean ± standard error (n = 3). Different letters indicated that there were significant differences among treatments of the same rice variety (P < 0.05).