Table 4.
Correlation analysis of Cd and Si content in different parts of rice varieties.
| SiRoot | SiStem | SiLeaf | SiPanicle | SiGlume | SiRice | CdRoot | CdStem | CdLeaf | CdPanicle | CdGlume | CdRice | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiRoot | 1 | |||||||||||
| SiStem | -0.356* | 1.000 | ||||||||||
| SiLeaf | 0.012 | 0.508** | 1.000 | |||||||||
| SiPanicle | -0.109 | 0.392** | 0.615** | 1.000 | ||||||||
| SiGlume | -0.159 | 0.310* | 0.062 | 0.295* | 1.000 | |||||||
| SiRice | 0.688** | -0.017 | 0.046 | -0.169 | -0.158 | 1.000 | ||||||
| CdRoot | -0.032 | -0.267 | -0.222 | 0.095 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 1.000 | |||||
| CdStem | 0.369** | -0.255 | 0.226 | 0.390** | -0.041 | -0.146 | -0.163 | 1.000 | ||||
| CdLeaf | 0.242 | -0.217 | 0.146 | 0.213 | -0.193 | -0.090 | -0.225 | 0.668** | 1.000 | |||
| CdPanicle | 0.348* | -0.446** | 0.019 | 0.230 | -0.064 | -0.196 | -0.180 | 0.860** | 0.774** | 1.000 | ||
| CdGlume | 0.143 | -0.425** | -0.392** | -0.424*** | 0.118 | -0.002 | -0.140 | 0.164 | 0.158 | 0.411** | 1.000 | |
| CdRice | 0.258 | -0.309* | -0.092 | 0.266 | -0.172 | -0.106 | 0.102 | 0.690** | 0.608** | 0.737** | 0.211 | 1.000 |
Correlation is the comparison between different treatments of the same variety. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.