Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 10;13:974486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974486

Table 2.

Goodness-of-fit statistics of competing measurement models.

Model χ2 df TLI CFI RMSEA [95% CI] SRMR AIC BIC
1a 983.12 367 0.87 0.88 0.06 [0.05, 0.06] 0.06 51334.79 51751.79
1b 908.07 366 0.89 0.90 0.05 [0.05, 0.06] 0.06 51245.65 51666.94
1c 836.21 365 0.90 0.91 0.05 [0.04, 0.05] 0.06 51162.97 51588.57
1d 789.82 364 0.91 0.92 0.05 [0.04, 0.05] 0.06 51110.62 51540.51
1e 763.43 363 0.91 0.92 0.05 [0.04, 0.05] 0.06 51080.06 51514.25
2 2101.70 371 0.64 0.67 0.09 [0.09, 0.10] 0.09 52553.93 52953.73
3 1257.91 371 0.81 0.83 0.07 [0.06, 0.07] 0.08 51646.12 52045.93
4 3024.33 377 0.45 0.49 0.11 [0.11, 0.12] 0.11 53721.54 54095.55

*Values significant at the p < 0.01 level (two-tailed). χ2, chi-square; df, degrees of freedom; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index; CFI, comparative fit index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; 95% CI = 95% confidence intervals; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; ABIC, adjusted Bayesian information criterion.