Table 2.
Coefficient | Standard error | t | p | 95% CI | |
Primary outcome | |||||
IUD criteria | |||||
Time: Follow-up 1 (T1) | −0.48 | 0.13 | −3.61 | 0.000 | −0.74; −0.21 |
Time: Follow-up 2 (T2) | −0.64 | 0.13 | −4.88 | 0.000 | −0.90; −0.38 |
Intervention* Time: Follow-up 1 (T1) | −0.13 | 0.17 | −0.78 | 0.433 | −0.47; 0.20 |
Intervention* Time: Follow-up 2 (T2) | −0.30 | 0.20 | −1.45 | 0.149 | −0.71; 0.11 |
Secondary outcomes | |||||
Readiness to change | |||||
Time: Follow-up 1 (T1) | −0.31 | 0.08 | −3.87 | 0.000 | −0.47; −0.15 |
Time: Follow-up 2 (T2) | −0.68 | 0.13 | −5.15 | 0.000 | −0.94; −0.42 |
Intervention* Time: Follow-up 1 (T1) | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.81 | 0.420 | −0.13; 0.32 |
Intervention* Time: Follow-up 2 (T2) | −0.21 | 0.21 | −1.00 | 0.317 | −0.63; 0.20 |
Self-efficacy to change | |||||
Time: Follow-up 1 (T1) | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.190 | −0.06; 0.29 |
Time: Follow-up 2 (T2) | −0.64 | 0.17 | −3.84 | 0.000 | −0.96; −0.31 |
Intervention* Time: Follow-up 1 (T1) | −0.01 | 0.12 | −0.16 | 0.876 | −0.26; 0.22 |
Intervention* Time: Follow-up 2 (T2) | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.86 | 0.393 | −0.27; 0.68 |
Impairments | |||||
Time: Follow-up 1 (T1) | 0.37 | 0.11 | 3.39 | 0.001 | 0.16; 0.59 |
Time: Follow-up 2 (T2) | 0.74 | 0.22 | 3.34 | 0.001 | 0.31; 1.18 |
Intervention* Time: Follow-up 1 (T1) | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.83 | 0.407 | −0.17; 0.43 |
Intervention* Time: Follow-up 2 (T2) | 0.26 | 0.32 | 0.83 | 0.408 | −0.36; 0.88 |
Notes: ITT = Intention-to-Treat, IUD = Internet use disorders, Time T1 = Follow-up after five months; T2 = Follow-up after ten months; CI = confidence interval. The analysis was adjusted for age, sex, migration background, self-efficacy to change, readiness to change, and the baseline score of each outcome.