|
Traditional open science practices
|
| 1 |
Reporting whether clinical trials were registered before they started recruitment |
9.71 |
| 2 |
Reporting whether study data were shared openly at the time of publication (with limited exceptions) |
9.18 |
| 3 |
Reporting what proportion of articles are published open access with a breakdown of time delay |
8.12 |
| 4 |
Reporting whether study code was shared openly at the time of publication (with limited exceptions) |
7.94 |
| 5 |
Reporting whether systematic reviews have been registered before data collection began |
6.76 |
| 6 |
Reporting whether clinical trials results appeared in the registry from 1 year after study completion |
6.76 |
| 7 |
Reporting whether there was a statement about study materials sharing with publications |
6 |
| 8 |
Reporting whether a reporting guideline checklist was used |
5.88 |
| 9 |
Reporting citations to data |
5.53 |
| 10 |
Reporting trial results in a manuscript-style publication (peer reviewed or preprint) |
4.82 |
| 11 |
Reporting the number of preprints |
4.35 |
| 12 |
Reporting systematic review results in a manuscript-style publication (peer reviewed or preprint) |
2.94 |
|
Broader transparency practices
|
| 1 |
Reporting whether author contributions were described |
5.12 |
| 2 |
Reporting whether author conflicts of interest were described |
4.71 |
| 3 |
Reporting the use of persistent identifiers when sharing data/code/materials |
4.65 |
| 4 |
Reporting whether ORCID identifiers were used |
4.47 |
| 5 |
Reporting whether data/code/materials are shared with a clear license |
3.47 |
| 6 |
Reporting whether research articles include funding statements |
3 |
| 7 |
Reporting whether the data/code/materials license is open or not |
2.59 |
