Table 2.
Models’ comparison with anova function.
| df | AIC | BIC | log-Likelihood | χ2 | dfχ2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 8 | 29,171 | 29,236 | −14,577 | |||
| Model 2 | 15 | 29,121 | 29,243 | −14,546 | 63.55 | 7 | <0.001 |
Models’ comparison with anova function.
| df | AIC | BIC | log-Likelihood | χ2 | dfχ2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 8 | 29,171 | 29,236 | −14,577 | |||
| Model 2 | 15 | 29,121 | 29,243 | −14,546 | 63.55 | 7 | <0.001 |