Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 27;87(1):124–136. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01663-1

Table 2.

Experiment 2: summary of the analysis akin to Claus (2015)

By subject By ttem
2 (Match) × 3 (Frame) × 2 (Hand.on.Lid) N1=79, F1(2,154)=.30, p=.74, ηG2<0.01 F2(2,46)=0.39, p=.68, ηG2<0.01
2 (Match) × 2 (Hand.on.Lid) on Frame 2 N1=79, F1(1,77)=3.52, p=0.06, ηG2<0.01 F2(1,23)=5.00, p<0.05, ηG2=0.03
2 (Match) × 2 (Hand.on.Lid) on Frame 3 N1=79, F1(1,77)=0.52, p=0.47, ηG2<.01 F2(1,23)=.67, p=0.42, ηG2<.01
 Match on Frame 2 (right-hand-on-lid) (one-tailed) N1=43, t1(42)=-2.11, p<.05, d=.32 t2(23)=-2.55, p<0.01, d=0.52
 Match on Frame 2 (left-hand-on-lid) N1=36, t1(35)=0.33, p=0.37, d=0.06 t2(23)=0.44, p=0.33, d=0.09