Table 3.
Agreement of IOP measurements between different methods before (Underline letters) vs. after (Boldface letters) FS-LASIK.
| IOPg by ORA | IOPcc by ORA | IOP by Corvis | bIOP by Corvis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOPg by ORA | 0.5 (−3.8 to 4.8) | 2.6 (−3.4 to 8.6) | 2.7 (−3.6 to 9.0) | |
| IOPcc by ORA | 3.2 (−0.4 to 6.9) | 2.0 (−5.1 to 9.1) | 2.1 (−4.8 to 9.1) | |
| IOP by Corvis | 6.0 (1.3 to 10.7) | 2.8 (−1.8 to 7.3) | 0.1 (−1.7 to 2.0) | |
| bIOP by Corvis | 7.9 (3.0 to 12.9) | 4.7 (0.4 to 9.0) | 2.0 (0.4 to 3.5) |
Data are presented as mean difference (95% limits of agreement) in mmHg.
The pairwise comparisons were arranged as follows: bIOP – IOP (Corvis); bIOP – IOPcc; bIOP – IOPg; IOP (Corvis) – IOPcc; IOP (Corvis) – IOPg; IOPcc – IOPg.