Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 22;37(2):313–319. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-01937-3

Table 3.

Number and percentage of eyes with subclinical CI-DMO and CI-DMO by ETDRS group at baseline (V1) and at the 3-year follow-up visit (V4) and respective LOR fluctuations and BCVA variations.

Subclinical CI-DMO (CRT ≥ 1 SD and <2SD) CI-DMO (CRT ≥ 2 SD)
ETDRS 10–20 ETDRS 35 ETDRS 43–47 ETDRS 10-20 ETDRS 35 ETDRS 43–47
Baseline (V1) 9/23 (39%) 10/31 (32%) 6/20 (30%) 2/23 (9%) 3/31 (10%) 3/20 (15.0%)
3-year Visit (V4) 6/23 (26%) 10/31 (32%) 8/20 (40%) 2/23 (9%) 2/31 (7%) 2/20 (10.0%)
Number of eyes with increased LOR ratio (≥1SD)
Subclinical CI-DMO CI-DMO
ETDRS 10–20 ETDRS 35 ETDRS 43–47 ETDRS 10–20 ETDRS 35 ETDRS 43–47
Baseline (V1) 2/9 (22%) 4/10 (40%) 3/6 (50%) 1/2 (50%) 1/3 (33%) 1/3 (33%)
3-year Visit (V4) 3/6 (50%) 7/10 (70%) 7/8 (88%) 2/2 (100%) 2/2 (100%) 2/2 (100%)
LOR fluctuations and BCVA variations over the follow-up period of subclinical CI-DMO or CI-DMO eyes
Vision Gain No Vision Change Vision Loss
Without LOR fluctuations 8 (67%) 2 (29%) 2 (18%)
With LOR fluctuations 4 (33%) 5 (71%) 9 (82%)
12 7 11

CI-DMO centre-involving diabetic macular oedema, CRT central retinal thickness, SD standard deviation, LOR low optical reflectivity, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity.