Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;37(2):280–284. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-01931-9

Table 2.

Treatment characteristics, outcome and safety profile.

Non-vitrectomized eyes (n = 130) Vitrectomized eyes (n = 106)
Naive eyes (n = 71) Refractory eyes (n = 59) Naive eyes (n = 76) Refractory eyes (n = 30)
Follow-up period, months, mean ± SD 24.0 ± 0.0 24.0 ± 0.0 24.3 ± 8.8 28.8 ± 17.0
No. of DEX-I during follow-up, mean ± SD 3.9 ± 0.5 3.1 ± 1.2 3.1 ± 1.1 3.9 ± 2.9
Baseline VA, logMAR, mean ± SD 0.59 ± 0.15 0.61 ± 0.19 0.57 ± 0.17 0.58 ± 0.40
VA at last FU, logMAR, mean ± SD 0.36 ± 0.14 0.47 ± 0.23 0.36 ± 0.16 0.55 ± 0.41
VA change baseline-last FU, logMAR, mean ± SD −0.23 ± 0.20 −0.15 ± 0.25 −0.21 ± 0.15 −0.03 ± 0.29
CST at baseline, µm, mean ± SD 583 ± 94 565 ± 107 693 ± 159 490 ± 133
CST at last FU, µm, mean ± SD 279 ± 61 313 ± 125 256 ± 41 317 ± 85, n = 26
CST change baseline-last FU, µm, mean ± SD −304 ± 117 −252 ± 180 −437 ± 181 −173 ± 170, n = 26
Eyes with additional anti-VEGF injections during FU, n (%) 1 (1.4) 10 (16.9) 2 (2.6) 6 (20.0)
Eyes that underwent cataract surgery within FU, n (% of phakic eyes) 15/16 (93.8) 7/22 (31.8) 11/12 (91.7) 5/12 (41.7)
Eyes that needed IOP-lowering treatment within FU, n (%) 5/70 (7.1) 13/57 (22.8) 4 (5.3) 9 (30.0)

CST central subfield thickness, FU follow-up, VA visual acuity.