Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 29;37(2):344–349. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-01947-1

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of temporal artery biopsy and ultrasound features for detecting giant cell arteritis.

Clinical diagnosis Performance [95% Confidence interval]
GCA (n = 35) Non-GCA (n = 43) Total

Temporal

Artery

Biopsy

Positive 24 0 24

Sn: 0.69 [0.51;0.83]

Sp: 1.00 [0.92;1.00]

PPV: 1.00a

NPV: 0.80 [0.71;0.86]

AUC: 0.84 [0.75;0.94]

Negative 11 43 54
Ultrasound Compression sign Positive 22 9 31

Sn: 0.63 [0.45;0.79]

Sp: 0.79 [0.64;0.94]

PPV: 0.71 [0.57;0.82]

NPV: 0.72 [0.62;0.81]

AUC: 0.71 [0.59;0.83]b

Negative 13 34 47
Ultrasound Halo-sign Positive 16 5 21

Sn: 0.47 [0.30;0.65]

Sp: 0.77 [0.53;0.92]

PPV: 0.76 [0.58;0.88]

NPV: 0.47 [0.37;0.57]

AUC: 0.67 [0.55;0.80]

Negative 18 16 34

Ultrasound

Reduced flow

Positive 2 3 5

Sn: 0.06 [0.01;0.20]

Sp: 0.93 [0.80;0.98]

PPV: 0.40 [0.11;0.79]

NPV: 0.55 [0.52;0.58]

AUC: 0.49 [0.36;0.63]

Negative 31 38 69

AUC area under the curve, PPV positive predictive value, N number, NPV negative predictive value, Sp Specificity, Sn Sensitivity.

aNot possible to calculate due to division by zero.

bSignificant difference between temporal artery biopsy and ultrasound (p = 0.048).