Table 5.

Binary logistic comparative models

Public university
Variable	B	s.e.	Wald	Sig.	Exp(B)	95% CI for EXP(B)
						Lower	Upper
Constant	−1.081	0.519	4.338	0.037	0.339
Safety	1.671**	0.421	15.769	0.000	5.317	2.331	12.130
Side effect	0.537	0.400	1.799	0.180	1.711	0.781	3.750
Efficacy	1.966**	0.456	18.578	0.000	7.142	2.921	17.460
Communication	−0.248	0.434	0.327	0.567	0.780	0.333	1.826
Religiosity	0.393	0.406	0.936	0.333	1.481	0.668	3.285
Conspiracy beliefs	0.265	0.390	0.462	0.497	1.303	0.607	2.798
Political roles	−1.092*	0.484	5.086	0.024	0.336	0.130	0.867
Trust	0.112	0.508	0.048	0.826	1.118	0.413	3.028
Rumours	−0.766*	0.357	4.598	0.032	2.152	1.068	4.335
Information sufficiency	−0.298	0.421	0.501	0.479	0.742	0.325	1.694
Variable	B	s.e.	Wald	Sig.	Exp(B)	95% CI for EXP(B)
						Lower	Upper
Private university
Constant	−1.819	0.485	14.077	0.000	0.162
Safety	1.297**	0.364	12.723	0.000	3.659	1.794	7.464
Side effect	0.328	0.333	0.968	0.325	1.388	0.722	2.667
Efficacy	1.108**	0.391	8.027	0.005	3.030	1.407	6.522
Communication	0.987***	0.331	8.886	0.003	2.684	1.402	5.136
Religiosity	0.613	0.322	3.615	0.057	1.845	0.981	3.470
Conspiracy beliefs	−0.218	0.321	0.463	0.496	0.804	0.429	1.507
Political roles	1.509***	0.498	9.194	0.002	4.523	1.705	11.997
Trust	1.041**	0.420	6.147	0.013	2.833	1.244	6.454
Rumours	0.140	0.331	0.180	0.671	1.151	0.602	2.200
Information sufficiency	−0.059	0.348	0.028	0.866	0.943	0.476	1.866

note: ** = significant at <0.01, * = significant at <0.05, level of significance.