Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 11;13:1103055. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1103055

Table 1.

Model Parameters: Clinical and Cost data.

Parameters Baseline value Range Reference Distribution
Minimum Maximum
Clinical data
Weibull survival model of sorafenib
OS Scale= 0.05419, Shape= 1.060795 (27)
PFS Scale= 0.21713, Shape= 0.81887 - - (27) -
HRs of other regimens versus sorafenib See the results of network meta-analysis
Proportion (%) of receiving active second-line treatment
Brivanib 0.210 0.168 0.252 (4) Beta
Donafenib 0.372 0.298 0.446 (11) Beta
Durvalumab 0.432 0.346 0.518 (18) Beta
Lenvatinib 0.330 0.264 0.396 (9) Beta
Linifanib 0.363 0.290 0.436 (6) Beta
Nivolumab 0.380 0.304 0.456 (10) Beta
Sorafenib 0.398 0.318 0.478 (412, 1419) Beta
Sunitinib 0.766 0.613 0.919 (5) Beta
Tislelizumab 0.485 0.388 0.582 (16) Beta
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab 0.360 0.288 0.432 (12) Beta
Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab 0.200 0.160 0.240 (15) Beta
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib 0.397 0.318 0.476 (17) Beta
Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib 0.441 0.353 0.529 (19) Beta
Sintilimab plus IBI305 0.290 0.232 0.348 (14) Beta
Sorafenib plus erlotinib 0.450 0.360 0.540 (8) Beta
Sorafenib plus doxorubicin 0.728 0.582 0.874 (7) Beta
Risk of main AEs in lenvatinib group
Risk of decreased appetite 0.046 0.037 0.055 (9) Beta
Risk of AST increased 0.050 0.040 0.060 (9) Beta
Risk of thrombocytopenia 0.055 0.044 0.066 (9) Beta
Risk of proteinuria 0.057 0.046 0.068 (9) Beta
Risk of decreased weight 0.076 0.061 0.091 (9) Beta
Risk of hypertension 0.233 0.186 0.280 (9) Beta
Risk of main AEs in tislelizumab group
Risk of AST increase 0.059 0.047 0.071 (16) Beta
Risk of main AEs in orther group See the results of randomized controlled trials (48, 1012, 14, 15, 1719) Beta
Utility
PFS 0.760 0.608 0.912 (27) Beta
PD 0.680 0.544 0.60 (27) Beta
Disutility due to AEs (grade ≧̸3) 0.160 0.128 0.192 (28) Beta
Cost data (US, $)
Drug cost, $/per cycle
Brivanib 10,769 8,615 12,923 Local Charge Gamma
Donafenib 2,204 1,763 2,645 Local Charge Gamma
Durvalumab 2,625 2,100 3,150 Local Charge Gamma
Lenvatinib 1,975 1,580 2,370 Local Charge Gamma
Linifanib 7,601 6,081 9,121 Local Charge Gamma
Nivolumab 2,515 2,012 3,018 Local Charge Gamma
Sorafenib 2,422 1,938 2,906 Local Charge Gamma
Sunitinib 1,312 1,050 1,574 Local Charge Gamma
Tislelizumab 842 674 1010 Local Charge Gamma
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab 6,624 5,299 7,945 Local Charge Gamma
Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab 6,330 5,064 7,596 Local Charge Gamma
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib 1,832 1,466 2,198 Local Charge Gamma
Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib 3,275 2,620 3,930 Local Charge Gamma
Sintilimab plus IBI305 3,819 3,055 4,583 Local Charge Gamma
Sorafenib plus erlotinib 2,974 2,379 3,569 Local Charge Gamma
Sorafenib plus doxorubicin 2,490 1,992 2,988 Local Charge Gamma
Regorafenib 3,154 2,523 3,785 Local Charge Gamma
Cost of AEs
Brivanib 74 59 89 (2932) Gamma
Donafenib 4 3 5 (29, 31) Gamma
Durvalumab 5 4 6 (30) Gamma
Lenvatinib 42 34 50 (2932) Gamma
Linifanib 96 77 115 (2932) Gamma
Nivolumab 6 5 7 (30) Gamma
Sorafenib 13 10 16 (2931) Gamma
Sunitinib 157 126 188 (2933) Gamma
Tislelizumab 6 5 7 (30) Gamma
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab 9 7 11 (29, 30) Gamma
Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab 22 18 26 (2931) Gamma
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib 117 94 140 (2933) Gamma
Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib 26 21 31 (2931) Gamma
Sintilimab plus IBI305 49 39 59 (2932) Gamma
Sorafenib plus erlotinib 154 123 185 (27, 29, 30, 33) Gamma
Sorafenib plus doxorubicin 81 65 97 (29, 3134) Gamma
Follow-up and monitoring per cycle 228 182 274 (35) Gamma
Best supportive care per cycle 423 338 508 (30) Gamma
Terminal care per patient 2,035 1,628 2,442 (35) Gamma
Body weight (kilogram) 65 52 78 (25, 26) Normal
Body surface area (meters2 ) 1.72 1.38 2.06 (25, 26) Normal
Discount rate 0.03 0 0.05 (34) Uniform

OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; IBI305, bevacizumab biosimilar; AEs, adverse events; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; NA, not applicable.