Table 1.
The summary of advantages and disadvantages of each method for measuring distance perception.
| Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal report | Intuitively clarify and simple | Influenced by cognitive correction and the observer’s cognition of distance; not suitable to be used alone |
| Perceptual distance matching | accurate; be applied in the vista space (> 30 m) and used in both real environment and VR environment | Affected by participant’s cognitive factors |
| Successive Equal-appearing Intervals of Distance Judgment Measurement | Confuse the measurements of exocentric distance and egocentric distance | |
| Blind Walking | Accurate | Take time and effort; easily produce practice and fatigue effects; difficultly applied to far space |
| Blind-walking gesturing | Integrate the distance and direction judgment, accurate | The same as blind walking |
| Blindfolded throwing | Simple and time-saving | Participants are required to have a high level of sports ability; inaccurate |
| Blind rope pulling | Accurate, can be applied to study the elder and patients, even in a narrow space | Participants need to be familiar with rope pulling. The complexity of experimental design affects task performance. |
| Triangulation-by-pointing | Investigate the rich psychological process; expand the research topic to 3D space | Inaccurate; complex calculation procedure, require larger test space, and takes time and effort |
| Triangulation-by-walking | More accurate than triangulation-by-pointing, other advantages are the same as Triangulation-by-pointing | The same as Triangulation-by-pointing |