1. Published primary research report |
1. Poor methodological quality (≥5 items are ranked as ‘Unclear’ or ‘No’ using JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research) |
2. Participants who were the patients diagnosed with COVID‐19, both in settings of hospitalisation or discharge |
2. Focused on experience regarding an intervention or being a part of the evaluation of the intervention |
3. Participants who include doctors, nurses, family members, the finding of patients diagnosed with COVID‐19 can be extracted |
3. Papers published on conference, book, newspaper or other media |
4. Focused on patients' s experience, perspectives after being infected with COVID‐19 |
4. Paper only with title and abstract |
5. Used an appropriate qualitative method (e.g. phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, narrative inquiry, interviews, observations) |
|
6. Used a mixed method, the qualitative part of which can be extracted |
|
7. Papers published on journal |
|
8. English or Chinese as its initial language |
|