Table 4.

Comparison of ΔFMA between the soft machine glove group and the conventional therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation groups.

	Group B vs. Group A				Group B vs. Group C
	Group B	Group A	Median difference (95% CI)*	P	Group B	Group C	Median difference (95% CI)*	P
ΔFMA	4 (2)	2 (2)	2 (1, 3)	<0.001	4 (2)	4 (3)	0 (−1, 2)	0.547

^*Non-normally distributed data with a median 95% CI using the Hodges–Lehmann method; group A, conventional treatment group; group B, soft robotic glove group; group C, repetitive transcranial magnetic group; ΔFMA, difference in FMA-UE score before and after treatment.