Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 11;13:1060656. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1060656

Table 2.

Bias assessment of longitudinal studies investigating the impact of cannabis legalization public health outcomes used for primary analyses.

First Author Year Representativeness Sample Size Non-respondents Ascertainment Comparability Assess outcome Statistical test Follow-up time frame Score
Alcocer 2020 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 12
Alley 2020 1 1 0 2 2 2 1 2 11
Bae 2019 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 12
Benedetti 2021 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 11
Bhave 2020 1 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 10
Cerdà 2020 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 12
Cerdà 2017 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 11
Chan 2020 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 10
Coley 2021 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 10
Delling 2019 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 11
Doucette 2021 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 12
Drake 2021 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 8
Kamer 2020 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 10
Kerr 2017 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 10
Kim 2021 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 12
Kropp Lopez 2020 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 2 8
Lane 2019 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 1 8
Lopez 2021 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 9
Lu 2018 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 2 10
Lu 2020 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 11
Masonbrink 2021 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 12
Matthay 2021 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 12
McMichael 2020 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 10
Mennis 2021b 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 9
Mennis 2021a 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 10
Miller 2017 1 1 0 2 2 2 1 2 11
Shi 2020 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 11
Shi 2019 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 11
Veligati 2020 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 12
Wallace 2020 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 5
Weinberger 2022 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 11
Wen 2021 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8