Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;53(1):6–16. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003373

Table 2.

Pooled Hedge's g effect sizes for RNT outcomes in each subgroup

Number of studies Hedge's g (95% CI) p value Heterogeneity (I2)
Subgroups
RNT v non-RNT
RNT focused interventions 17 −0.50 (−0.78 to −0.22) 0.06 84.81
Non-RNT focused interventions 9 −0.52 (−0.87 to −0.17) 82.07
Content v process
Content focused intervention 14 −0.13 (−0.28 to 0.01) 0.01 38.28
Process focused intervention 10 −0.85 (−1.29 to −0.41) 89.45
Intervention format
Group 4 −1.35 (−2.29 to −0.41) 0.02 95.16
Individual 5 −0.56 (−1.11 to −0.01) 81.08
Digital or self-guided 16 −0.24 (−0.44 to −0.04) 72.12
Number of sessions
Less than 8 sessions 16 −0.58 (−0.89 to −0.27) 0.12 86.80
More than 8 sessions 4 −0.06 (−0.45 to 0.33) 76.14
Continuous 4 −0.35 (−0.70 to 0.01) 64.46
Clinical group
Elevated depression and/or anxiety 18 −0.31 (−0.52 to −0.10) 0.30 78.99
Clinical depression 2 −1.53 (−4.67 to 1.61) 98.23
Clinical anxiety 4 −0.64 (−1.07 to −0.21) 57.31
Sample age
Younger than 18 years 9 −0.27 (−0.58 to 0.04) 0.20 84.97
18 years or older 15 −0.56 (−0.88 to −0.24) 84.32
Recruitment context
Community 4 −0.30 (−0.60 to 0.00) 0.42 66.48
University/school 9 −0.47 (−0.75 to −0.19) 87.14
Clinical setting 1 −0.93 (−1.73 to −0.14) 0
Study quality
Low quality 7 −0.39 (−0.54 to −0.25) 0.49 90.82
High quality 17 −0.39 (−0.63 to −0.15 81.20