Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 11;12:1064722. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1064722

Table 3.

The Performance of ΔCpPAX1 in predicting CIN2 upgrade to CIN3, and CIN3 upgrade to ESCC after conization.

Test Sensitivity
% (95%CI)
Specificity
% (95%CI)
PPV
% (95%CI)
NPV
% (95%CI)
OR
(95%CI)
CIN2CDB (n = 100)
CIN3+CKC (n = 36)
△CpPAX1 ≤ 10.83 44.4 (27.9-61.9) 82.8 (71.3-91.1) 59.3 (43.2-73.6) 72.6 (65.9-78.4) 3.86
(1.53-9.71)
Cytology (ASCUS+) 44.4 (27.7-61.9) 45.3 (32.8-58.3) 31.4 (22.9-41.2) 59.2 (49.3-68.3) 0.66
(0.29-1.51)
hrHPV (+) 97.2 (85.5-99.9) 9.4 (3.5-19.3) 37.6 (35.4-39.9) 85.7 (42.9-98.0) 3.62
(0.42-31.34)
CIN3CDB (n = 118)
ESCCCKC (n = 23)
△CpPAX1 ≤ 6.36 78.3 (56.3-92.6) 84.2 (75.3-90.9) 54.5 (41.8-66.7) 94.1 (88.0-97.2) 19.20
(6.18-59.67)
Cytology ≥ LSIL 78.3 (56.3-92.5) 58.9 (48.4-68.9) 31.6 (25.0-38.9) 91.8 (83.5-96.1) 5.17
(1.77-15.10)
HPV16/18 (+) 73.9 (51.6-89.8) 46.3 (36.0-56.8) 25.0 (19.7-31.2) 88.0 (78.1-93.8) 2.44
(0.89-6.74)

Estimated sensitivity and specificity of PAX1m at maximum value of Youden index.