Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 10;25:e39742. doi: 10.2196/39742

Table 1.

Subdomains of the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework used for data analysis with 2 data-led additions to the original subdomain list (n=111) [10].

NASSS subdomain and codes Inductive theme Papers, n (%)
1a. Nature of condition or illness

1a.1 Type or format of care needs 11 (9.9)

1a.2 Ambiguous, complicated, or rare decisions 23 (20.7)

1a.3 Quality of current care 18 (16.2)

1a.4 Decision urgency and impact 11 (9.9)
1b. Comorbidities

1b.1 Other associated health problems 5 (4.5)

1b.2 Aligning patient and health priorities 6 (5.4)
1c Sociocultural factors No subthemes 13 (11.7)
2a. Material properties

2a.1 Usability of the tool 28 (25.2)

2a.2 Lack of emotion 12 (10.8)

2a.3 Large amounts of changing data 14 (12.6)
2b. Knowledge to use it

2b.1 Knowledge required of patients 24 (21.6)

2b.2 Enabling users to evaluate tools 20 (18)

2b.3 Agreeing the scope of use 19 (17.1)
2c. Knowledge generated by it

2c.1 Communicate meaning effectively 45 (40.5)

2c.2 Target a clinical need 23 (20.7)

2c.3 Recommend clear action 25 (22.5)
2d. Supply model

2d.1 Equipment and network requirements 23 (20.7)

2d.2 Working across multiple health data systems 25 (22.5)

2d.3 Quality of the health data and guidelines used 33 (29.7)
2e. Who owns the intellectual property? No subthemes 14 (12.6)
2f. Care pathway positioninga

2f.1 Extent of tools’ independence 23 (20.7)

2f.2 When and to whom the tool responds 21 (18.9)

2f.3 How and where the tool responds 20 (18)
3a. Supply-side value (to developer) No subthemes 7 (6.3)
3b. Demand-side value (to patient)

3b.1 Time required for service provision 27 (24.3)

3b.2 Patient-centered care 22 (19.8)

3b.3 Cost of health care 17 (15.3)

3b.4 Impact on outcomes for patients 28 (25.2)

3b.5 Educating and prompting HCPsb 41 (36.9)

3b.6 Consistency and authority of care 33 (29.7)
4a. Staff (role and identity)

4a.1 Appetite and needs differ between staff groups 33 (29.7)

4a.2 Tools redefine staff roles 33 (29.7)

4a.3 Aligning with staff values 28 (25.2)
4b. Patient (simple vs complex input)

4b.1 Inconvenience for patients 10 (9.0)

4b.2 Patients’ control over their care 14 (12.6)

4b.3 Aligning patients’ agendas with tool use 11 (9.9)
4c. Carers No subthemes 4 (3.6)
4d. Relationshipsa

4d.1 Patients’ relationships with their HCPs 30 (27)

4d.2 Users’ relationships with tools 13 (11.7)

4d.3 Relationships between health professionals 21 (18.9)
5a. Capacity to innovate in general

5a.1 Resources needed to deliver the benefits 29 (26.1)

5a.2 Leadership 26 (23.4)
5b. Readiness for this technology

5b.1 Pressure to find a way of improving things 9 (8.1)

5b.2 Suitability of hosts’ premises and technology 15 (13.5)
5c. Nature of adoption or funding decision No subthemes 7 (6.3)
5d. Extent of change needed to organizational routines

5d.1 Fitting the tool within current practices 14 (12.6)

5d.2 Change to intensity of work for staff 22 (19.8)
5e. Work needed to plan, implement, and monitor change

5e.1 Training requirements 17 (15.3)

5e.2 Effort and resources for tool launch 23 (20.7)
6a. Political or policy context

6a.1 Different ways to incentivize providers 10 (9)

6a.2 Importance of government strategy 8 (7.2)

6a.3 Policy and practice influence each other more 15 (13.5)
6b. Regulatory and legal issues

6b.1 Impact on patient groups 19 (17.1)

6b.2 Product assurance 14 (12.6)

6b.3 Deciding who is responsible 8 (7.2)
6c. Professional bodies

6c.1 Resistance from professional culture 20 (18)

6c.2 Lack of understanding between professional groups 9 (8.1)
6d. Sociocultural context

6d.1 Culture’s effect on tool acceptability 17 (15.3)

6d.2 Public reaction to tools varies 10 (9)
6e. Interorganizational networking No subthemes 14 (12.6)
7a. Scope for adaptation over time

7a.1 Normalization of technology and decreased resistance 15 (13.5)

7a.2 Improvement of technology and its implementation 11 (9.9)
7b. Organizational resilience No subthemes 3 (2.7)

aIndicates a subdomain added to the original NASSS framework through application of the best-fit framework synthesis method [21].

bHCP: health care professional.