Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 11;16:1099019. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1099019

TABLE 3.

The diagnostic performances of ADC histogram parameters that were statistically different between IDHmut/MGMTmet and the other glioma group, minimum ADC and mean ADC of direct measurements and multivariate logistic regression models.

Variable AUC 95% CI Cut-off value Sensitivity Specificity
ADC histogram parameters
10th percentile 0.860 0.787–0.934 937.50 80.0% 83.3%
90th percentile 0.759 0.673–0.846 1216.00 100.0% 42.3%
Mean 0.823 0.748–0.899 1108.79 85.0% 69.2%
Median 0.824 0.748–0.900 1085.50 85.0% 67.9%
Minimum 0.655 0.545–0.766 553.50 57.5% 75.6%
Root mean squared 0.818 0.742–0.893 1111.21 85.0% 67.9%
Kurtosis 0.666 0.567–0.765 5.07 87.5% 41.0%
Skewness 0.726 0.632–0.821 0.78 85.0% 59.0%
Direct ADC measurements
Minimum ADC 0.810 0.721–0.899 945.50 65.0% 91.0%
Mean ADC 0.844 0.770–0.918 1073.17 67.5% 89.7%
Multivariate logistic regression models
ADC histogram parameters 0.916 0.868–0.964 82.5% 85.9%
Direct ADC measurements 0.851 0.780–0.921 67.5% 88.5%
ADC histogram parameters + direct ADC measurements 0.938 0.896–0.980 87.5% 87.2%

AUC, area under the ROC curve; CI, confidence interval.