Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;16(4):246–255. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000141

Table 5.

Relation between treatment and outcomes of patients with prostate cancer (n = 50).

Treatment Relapse Mortality
Patients with prostate cancer (n = 39), n (%) Absent
(n = 23), n (%)
Present
(n = 16), n (%)
p* Patients with prostate cancer (n = 50), n (%) Alive (n = 35), n (%) Died (n = 15), n (%) p*
Local radiotherapy
 No 1 (2.6) 0 (0) 1 (100) 0.410 12 (24) 2 (16.7) 10 (83.3) <0.001†
 Yes 38 (97.4) 23 (60.5) 15 (39.5) 38 (76) 33 (86.8) 5 (13.2)
Hormonal deprivation
 LHRH 15 (38.5) 12 (80) 3 (20) 0.035† 15 (30) 12 (80) 3 (20) 0.502
 LHRH + AR blockers 24 (61.5) 11 (45.8) 13 (54.2) 35 (70) 23 (65.7) 12 (34.3)
Neoadjuvant hormonal
 No 38 (97.4) 23 (60.5) 15 (39.5) 0.410 38 (76) 33 (86.8) 5 (13.2) <0.001†
 Yes 1 (2.6) 0 (0) 1 (100) 12 (24) 2 (16.7) 10 (83.3)
Concurrent hormonal
 No 7 (17.9) 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) 0.206 18 (36) 8 (44.4) 10 (55.6) 0.003†
 Yes 32 (82.1) 17 (53.1) 15 (46.9) 32 (64) 27 (84.4) 5 (15.6)
Posttreatment prostate-specific antigen, ng/mL
 ≤0.5 28 (71.8) 18 (64.3) 10 (35.7) 0.307 34 (68) 24 (70.6) 10 (29.4) 1.000
 >0.5 11 (28.2) 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5) 16 (32) 11 (68.8) 5 (31.2)
Relapse (n = 39) (n = 33) (n = 6)
 Absent 23 (59) 21 (91.3) 2 (8.7) 0.205
 Present 16 (41) 12 (75) 4 (25)

AR = androgen receptor; LHRH = luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone.

Categorical variables are expressed as number (percentage).

2 Test.

p < 0.05 (significant).