Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Dec 22;243:109752. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109752

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Magnitude of the effect of group on the cognitive reappraisal contrast. A. An unthresholded effect size map depicting the magnitude of the effect of group during the decrease-negative relative to look-negative contrast. Warmer colors (e.g., orange) indicate a greater effect of group during the decrease-negative cue, while cool colors (e.g., blue) indicate a greater effect of group during the look-negative cue. As can be seen, family history group does not appear to have a meaningful effect on cognitive reappraisal capacity as the majority of brain regions have small effect sizes d < .20. B. The graph depicts the sample sizes needed to detect a small effect of d = .20 at various power levels. To be adequately powered (.80) to detect a meaningful yet small effect (d = .20) of group on cognitive reappraisal capacity, we would need a sample of 788 participants (indicated by the black circle).